Archive for DOMA

Breaking- Senators Heidi Heitkamp, Joe Donnelly Back Gay Marriage

lovegaymarriage

Literally, when I heard two more Senators had backed it, I thought, “Well, I know one ain’t Joe!” Good on them. (Click cartoon to enlarge.)

Sens. Heidi Heitkamp (D-N.D.) and Joe Donnelly (D-Ind.), both hailing from deeply red states, announced on Friday their support for gay marriage.

“In speaking with North Dakotans from every corner of our great state, and much personal reflection, I have concluded the federal government should no longer discriminate against people who want to make lifelong, loving commitments to each other or interfere in personal, private, and intimate relationships,” Heitkamp said in a statement. “I view the ability of anyone to marry as a logical extension of this belief. The makeup of families is changing, but the importance of family is enduring.”

“In recent years, our country has been involved in an important discussion on the issue of marriage equality,” Donnelly said on Facebook. “While serving in the House of Representatives, I had the opportunity to act on a core belief of mine: we are a stronger country when we draw on the strengths of all Americans. I voted to repeal ‘don’t ask, don’t tell’ and was an original supporter of the bill that would make it illegal to discriminate against someone in the workplace because of their sexual orientation.”

“It is also for that reason that I oppose amending either Indiana’s or our nation’s constitution to enshrine in those documents an ‘us’ and a ‘them,’ instead of a ‘we,’” he continued. “With the recent Supreme Court arguments and accompanying public discussion of same-sex marriage, I have been thinking about my past positions and votes. In doing so, I have concluded that the right thing to do is to support marriage equality for all.”

SCOTUS “using ‘opposite-sex marriage’ to describe heterosexuality should already be counted as a victory”

gay rights keep your elephant out of my bedroom smaller

Today’s guest post by the one, the only, Will Durst:

EQUAL IS AS EQUAL DOES

The nation held its collective breath and turned not just blue but a veritable rainbow of colors as the Supreme Court spent a goodly part of two days hearing oral arguments on gay marriage. Well, at least they were in the same room as arguments about gay marriage were oralled. In a position to eavesdrop on a series of gay marriage arguments; if they were of a mind to.

You can never really pin down which of the 9 Phat Ebony Robes is hearing what. Court watchers long have presumed Justice Scalia underwent a powdered-wig strict constructionist-filter installation years back that insures nothing post-18th Century funnels through to his cognitive cells. And if Antonin can’t hear it, as far as Clarence Thomas is concerned, it doesn’t exist. The others hear what they want to hear. Proving they do indeed represent America.

The Supremes will weigh in on the Defense of Marriage Act and the legality of California’s Proposition 8 sometime in June. Until then the suspense is killing us- thrillingly. Although the fact they’re using “opposite-sex marriage” to describe heterosexuality should already be counted as a victory. And like every thing else that comes before the court, final disposition probably depends on which side of the bed Justice Kennedy wakes up.

Don’t tell the Berobed Ones, (musn’t allow deeper insecurity complexes to develop) but it doesn’t really matter how they rule, because gay marriage is on the fast track to be permanently woven into the fabric of our national diversity quilt. The handwriting is on the wall. And the penmanship is stunning.

Across the country, same-sex marriage polls have risen faster than property taxes in a tulip bubble. Pollster Nate Silver, of the NYT, the nation’s soothsayer, expects national support to increase 1½ percentage points each year. And let us lay thanks at the remote of the one-eyed HD beast, television.

Familiarity breeds tolerance. Gay celebs such as Ellen DeGeneres and Anderson Cooper have encouraged kids of today to live their lives openly. Allowing middle America enough interactive glances to realize the gay community doesn’t devote most of its waking hours attempting to engorge the Armies of Sodom brandishing pitchforks and sporting horns. Like we were told. Over and over.

When you say gay people, the emphasis is on the people and the only real difference between gay and straight is which way your head faces during sex. That’s it. And an uncanny ability to assemble amazing appetizer trays. Grilled asparagus wrapped in goat cheese and prosciutto? Yes! Fist bump. Blow it up. Now talk about it.

And forget the malevolent clowns of the Westboro Baptist Church, who make God laugh so hard he spits milk through his nose. Casual bigotry is dying off. Literally. Old people and their parents with a life radius of 30 miles. Oh sure, there will always be prejudice, stupidity and fear but society is rapidly realizing that “gay” is just another adjective; like blonde or buff or stinky.

Whether its generational shifts, enlightened minds or disco going mainstream, the tide of tolerance is proving inexorable. Only a matter of time before gay marriage is universally accepted, and then it will seem perfectly routine until eventually it becomes mandatory. Dibs on Clooney!

5 time Emmy- nominee Will Durst’s new one- man show “BoomerAging: From LSD to OMG” opens previews at the Marsh, San Francisco on April 16th. Go to themarsh.org or willdurst.com for more info.

Willie Nelson quips, “Gay people should be just as miserable as the rest of us,” all people deserve equal protection under the law.

WillieNelson

My dear friend @Anomaly100 at FreakOutNation is coming to the rescue by allowing us to cross-post her awesome posts while Paddy is laid up. She’s amazing.

Did I mention how amazing Anomaly is? In case you missed it, she’s amazing.

Here’s her latest:

With all eyes on the Supreme Court during the past two days of hearing arguments on Marriage Equality, Willie Nelson weighs in. Wednesday night, in an interview in Austin, Texas, Willie said he believes love doesn’t discriminate, “and it shouldn’t be discriminated against.” Nelson added during his interview that gay people should be as miserable as the rest of us.

Nelson has been paying close attention to the Supreme Court arguments over same-sex marriage and the Defense of Marriage Act, the federal law defining marriage as the union of a man and a woman. In an exclusive with Texas Monthly, Willie quipped, “[Gay people] should be just as miserable as the rest of us” before giving a more nuanced explanation of what he says has been a life-long, unwavering belief that all people deserve equal protection under the law.

Nelson added that everyone should be able to get married, if they so choose to, “I never thought of  marriage as something only for men and women. But I’d never marry a guy I didn’t like.”

Texas Monthly said: A lot of people think this battle echoes the fight for civil rights in the sixties.

Nelson responded: ”It does. It’s about human rights. As humanity, we’ve come through so many problems from the beginning to here.  I guess it finally had to come around to this. This is just another situation, another problem. We’ll work it out and move on.”

When asked: ”And what do you think they’ll say when they look back on this?” Nelson responded,We’ll look back and say it was crazy that we ever even argued about this.”

There’s much more at Texas Monthly, including custom downloadable Human Rights Campaign avatars.

In honor of Mr. Nelson, we’ve added his video/song ‘Cowboys Are Frequently, Secretly (Fond Of Each Other)’:

Majority of Justices Skeptical of Federal Ban on Benefits to Same-Sex Spouses

doma line gay rightsLink

NYCLUPIC: LOOK at the panoramic scene outside #SCOTUS hearings in NYCLU #DOMA case. #united4marriage #time4marriage

Just to catch you up on the Supreme Court arguments o’ the day, here’s a New York Times email alert:

A majority of the justices on Wednesday questioned the constitutionality of the Defense of Marriage Act of 1996, as the Supreme Court took up the volatile issue of same-sex marriage for a second day.

Justice Anthony M. Kennedy, widely considered the swing vote on the divided court, joined the four liberals in posing skeptical questions to a lawyer defending the law, which defines marriage as the union of a man and a woman for the purposes of more than 1,000 federal laws and programs.

“The question is whether or not the federal government under a federalism system has the authority to regulate marriage,” Justice Kennedy said during oral arguments, suggesting that the question should be left to the states. He disagreed with the contention that the federal law simply created a single definition for federal purposes, noting that same-sex couples are not treated the same as other married couples. “It’s not really uniformity,” he said.

Video- Bill O’Reilly: Gay Rights Advocates Have ‘Compelling Argument’

Wow, if they’ve lost Bill O’Reilly… Via TPM.

Cartoons of the Day- Supreme Court Takes On DOMA

scotusdoma3

"Truth, Justice and ..." (Mark Streeter/Savannah Morning News)

scotusdoma2

Via.

Poll-itics: Dear conservatives, you lost… again. Support for marriage equality hits new high.

moment of happy smaller

poll marriage equality gays

The Washington post has a new Washington Post-ABC News poll up. They include a few graphs, including the one above, and the good news is that 58% of respondents think gay couples should be able to marry legally:

Public support for gay marriage has hit a new high as Americans increasingly see homosexuality not as a choice but as a way some people are [...]

The poll shows that 58 percent of Americans now believe it should be legal for gay and lesbian couples to get married; 36 percent say it should be illegal. Public attitudes toward gay marriage are a mirror image of what they were a decade ago: in 2003, 37 percent favored gay nuptials, and 55 percent opposed them.

That first sentence is remarkable. Read it again.

Hillary Clinton has announced her support for marriage equality. The “reinvented” Republican party’s John Boehner didn’t. In fact:

The Growth and Opportunity Project report also states that when voters who recently left the Republican Party were asked to describe the party, they used phrases like, “scary,” “out of touch,” “narrow-minded” and full of “stuffy old men.” 

But will the Supreme Court feel the same as most Americans? Or will voters add five of them to the out of touch, narrow-minded, stuffy list?

Today Think Progress sent out this email:

Next week, the Supreme Court will hear arguments over whether same-sex couples should get the same federal protections and rights that straight couples enjoy. The moment could mark an important tipping point in the history of the LGBT community.

Here’s a little background on the case:

In 1996, the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) codified discrimination into law by defining the federal government’s definition of marriage as between a man and a woman.

What does that mean? It means that immigration laws can senselessly break up families; that military spouses can’t get financial assistance to buy a home if their partner is the same gender; and that the wife of a woman killed in combat, or stricken down by cancer, won’t get survivors’ benefits.

Luckily, President Obama’s administration decided to stop enforcing DOMA, and, when the case was accepted by the Supreme Court, his administration filed a brief urging them to overturn it. But House Republicans who support the law have allocated $3 million to continue defending it — money that, surely, would be better used elsewhere.

Still, it’s not all bad news when it comes to DOMA. Major players in the political debate have come to their senses and denounced discrimination. A prominent Republican Senator just flipped his stance on marriage equality, saying that he wanted his son to have the same rights as his other children; twenty-one senators who voted for DOMA changed their minds and now oppose it; nearly 300 companies and municipalities filed briefs urging the Supreme Court to strike down the law; and sociologists and major medical organizations have told the justices that they need to put an end to the discrimination.

Even former President Bill Clinton — the man who signed DOMA into law in the first place — wrote in a recent op-ed, “I have come to believe that DOMA is contrary to those principles and, in fact, incompatible with our Constitution.”

We, the people, know what’s right. We overwhelmingly support marriage equality, because we know that it’s what our Constitution provides us: Equal protection under the law.

Now it’s time to see whether the Supreme Court thinks so, too.