Archive for corporations

Maine Joins 12 Other States in Officially Supporting an End to Corporate ‘Personhood’

And it’s high time, too.
mapofmaine

From Mark Karlin, Editor of BuzzFlash at Truthout:

Twelve states are officially backing a constitutional amendment to eliminate corporate personhood, and Maine just became the thirteenth.

According to he Bangor Daily News:

Sen. Richard Woodbury, I-Yarmouth, plans to introduce a resolution Tuesday in the Maine Senate that directs the state’s congressional delegation to support a constitutional amendment that would overturn the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2010 “Citizens United” opinion equating campaign spending with free speech….

In March, independent U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont and Democratic U.S. Rep. Ted Deutch of Florida introduced a constitutional amendment to overturn “Citizens United.” The proposed amendment would “expressly exclude for-profit corporations from the rights given to natural persons by the Constitution of the United States, prohibit corporate spending in all elections, and affirm the authority of Congress and the states to regulate corporations and to regulate and set limits on all election contributions and expenditures.”

More here at Truthout:

Study: Women make better corporate leaders than men

duhThere goes that whacky Los Angeles Times again, quoting a study that states the obvious. The study is from the International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics and was conducted by researchers at A.T. Still University in Arizona and McMaster University in Canada:

Women make better corporate leaders than men because they are more likely to make fair decisions when competing interests are at stake, a new study has found.

well duh

Women leaders take a cooperative approach when making decisions, the study says. But check this out:

Male directors, who made up 75% of the survey sample, prefer making decisions using rules, regulations and tradition, the survey found. Female directors, by contrast, are less constrained by rules and more prepared to “rock the boat,” the researchers found. 

Hold on… Isn’t it mostly male corporate types who despise government regulation (while insisting on laws forcing women to have babies against their will, of course) and hate oversight and rules (while forcing women to undergo unnecessary trans-vaginal ultrasounds, of course)?

But now we discover that the menfolk don’t mind any of that as long as it’s they who are doing the regulating.

duh

Per the study, women leaders are also more likely to collaborate, cooperate, build consensus, are more inquisitive, and are more tend to see more than one solution to a problem.

So naturally, corporate boards would welcome them to their board families way more often than not, right?  

Globally, women make up about 9% of corporate board members, the study said.

Right. Got it. Check. That makes all the sense in the world.

By the way, with at least one female director involved, companies were 20% less likely to file bankruptcy and did better financially.

Ahem. The study’s conclusion: Women are fairer, more reasonable, better leaders, are way cooler (I just threw that one in for fun), and make better corporate leaders than men.

sheen Duh Winning

iLEAD: Usher and Accenture team up, align with public schools to train 50,000 youth to be global leaders

usher iLeadwww.ushersnewlook.org

Kids!
I don’t know what’s wrong with these kids today!
Kids!
Who can understand anything they say?
Kids!
They a disobedient, disrespectful oafs!
Noisy, crazy, dirty, lazy, loafers!
While we’re on the subject:
Kids!
You can talk and talk till your face is blue!
Kids!
But they still just do what they want to do!
Why can’t they be like we were,
Perfect in every way?
What’s the matter with kids today?

What IS the matter with kids today? The answer: Absolutely nothing. At least not once Usher and Accenture train them to be the leaders many are destined to be through what looks to be a wonderful, productive, positive project. This is exactly what we should be doing, emphasizing important skills for our kids, and showing them they can shine… with a little help from the pros (more at the link).

Sometimes those pesky corporations we love to complain about can do very good things. Hey, they’re people too, right?

Usher’s New Look, a non-profit organization founded by Usher Raymond IV, today announced their partnership with Accenture to help New Look reach its goal of training and certifying 50,000 youth as global leaders. The effort reflects Accenture’s Skills to Succeed corporate citizenship initiative.

Over two years, Accenture is supporting New Look with a more than $900,000 contribution, which includes a cash grant as well as pro bono support to develop iLEAD – an online, interactive, curriculum-based platform that will provide data management and tracking for students and parents as they move through New Look’s four leadership pillars – talent, education, career and service.

Through the iLEAD platform, New Look will be able to better track the progress of enrolled students. It will also support developing leaders in schools, raising graduation rates and preparing youth for college and career readiness.The platform will align with national public school, career training and development standards.

Video- Elizabeth Warren blasts Romney at Obama fundraiser

She can burn it up. Via Politico.

Leaked memo: Obama administration backing international court that would have the right to override national laws in favor of corporations

I’d like to get feedback from President Obama’s staunchest defenders on this one.

Your Daily Dose of BuzzFlash at Truthout, via Mark Karlin:

What is news is that the Obama administration is backing an international court that would have the right to override national laws in favor of corporations.  The implications are staggering for the environment, financial oversight and unions, according to the Huffington Post. Even life-saving medicine could be monopolized and raised to a level that would make some vital medications unaffordable to all but those with wealth or top insurance policies. According to The HP, the Obama administration has been pursuing:

…efforts in other international negotiations to establish controversial medical patents that grant companies long-term monopolies on life-saving medications. Those monopolies increase drug prices, which impede access to medications, particularly in developing nations. The World Health Organization and dozens of nonprofit public health groups have objected to the standards sought by the Obama administration. Two United Nations groups recently urged global governments not to agree to trade terms currently being advocated by the Obama administration, on the grounds that such rules would hurt public health.

As I noted in a BuzzFlash at Truthout commentary on June 11, I have come to see the nations of the world more and more at the mercy of an international global corporate and financial elite – and this leaked memo provides more fodder for that theory.  Americans, if the agreement is reached, won’t even have the right to hold foreign corporations accountable in US courts for many egregious violations:

The irony is that the right-wing of America has long despised the United Nations, but the current reality of economic management of the earth is falling into the hands of a few elite institutions, developed regions (call them nations if you will), and international financial firms and corporations.  Call it the United Global Elite instead of the United Nations.

Members of the global elite, as BuzzFlash at Truthout has mentioned before, are more at home with each other than with the other 99% of their own countries. The G-8, the G-20, call them what you will, but the economic fate of nations is decided to a great degree at international meetings of the haves.

This is not a conspiracy theory. It is the result of a world of global trade, finances, and marketing that is not confined to national boundaries. Yes, nations have distinct legal systems, but their financial fates and corporate legal disputes with local, state and federal governments are more and more determined by decisions made at a global level by individuals at a great distance from working people – or the person trying to survive on subsistence living.

The HP states bluntly:

A critical document from President Barack Obama’s free trade negotiations with eight Pacific nations was leaked online early Wednesday morning, revealing that the administration intends to bestow radical new political powers upon multinational corporations, contradicting prior promises….

Trans-Pacific negotiations have been taking place throughout the Obama presidency. The deal is strongly supported by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the top lobbying group for American corporations. Obama’s Republican opponent in the 2012 presidential elections, Mitt Romney, has urged the U.S. to finalize the deal as soon as possible.

So the same group of people who have viciously derided the notion of the United Nations encroaching on US unilateral power are now eager to give up chunks of our local, state and national legal recourse to an international tribunal, so as to benefit corporations?

Please read the rest here.

Cartoon of the Day- Corporations have Spoken

Deserved a post all on it’s own. Via.

Quote O’ The Day: Freudian Slip by Chris Matthews Edition. VIDEO ADDED.

Heard just now on Hardball:

Chris Matthews to Elizabeth Warren on why President Obama isn’t getting many corporate donations: “Why are corporations bank robbing, er, bankrolling Romney? Now THERE’S a good Freudian slip!”

‘Nuff said.

UPDATE: Here’s the video of the exact quote:

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Here is the entire segment:

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy