Archive for corporate media

“The press reporting on the press is indicative of the very problem with the press”

President Barack Obama delivers remarks during the White House Correspondents’ Association Dinner at the Washington Hilton Hotel in Washington, D.C., April 27, 2013. First Lady Michelle Obama attended the dinner with the President. (Official White House Photo by Chuck Kennedy)

Please welcome guest blogger Cathi Peyton Erman to TPC. She’s one of my favorite Twitter, Facebook, and Sulia pals, is a lifelong Baptist Christian who is Pro-Life, Pro-Gun and Pro-Death penalty.  She is also president of the Tea Party Patriots Intelligence Brigade.  Her political idol is George W. Bush and her religious idol is Rev. Pat Robertson.  She proudly receives her information from Fox’s News and also follows Rush Limbaugh and Glenn Beck.

But oddly, per her Sulia page, she’s a “Progressive, liberal Socialist Democrat who tries to find some humor  in the brain numbing Republican party.” Go figure.

She’ll contribute posts whenever she can while Paddy is recovering from surgery on her broken arm.

Here’s her take on the White House Correspondents’ Dinner:

Am I the only person to have ambivalent feelings about the White House Correspondents Association dinner, aka #nerdprom?

I have wondered for a long time now about how this dinner has changed through the years.  We no longer have very many true “journalists”.  “Infotainment News” has all but replaced hard-hitting news.

I don’t really blame the writers and journalists that much, because it seems our “news” is now a cross between flashy, attention grabbing three-minute segments and a reality show about the Kardashians.  The faster, more lurid scandals of the moment have replaced in depth journalism of the old days.

Also, it always struck me as odd that Hollywood celebrities attending the dinner are there at all.  I mean, really.  The press coverage that the dinner receives is pretty much all about the glitter – celebrities, red carpet and comedy routines.  Am I the only one who finds that the press reporting on the press is indicative of the very problem with the press?

Then it dawned on me.  Corporate sponsors!  They own the news!  I could go into a rant about that, but Charles P. Pierce wrote the perfect blog about all of this mixed bag of questions that have perplexed me.  Now HE’S a writer!

Facebook made $1.1 billion in profits in 2012, paid zero corporate income tax, will get over $425 million in refunds

unfriended

I do not like Facebook. I do not like Facebook with a passion. I wish I could delete my account, but we use it for sharing our Political Carnival blog posts, and we get such positive feedback (meaning people thank us) that we continue to post there.

I could even give up FB access to my family and friends, although it wouldn’t be easy, which is exactly what I plan to do if and when my association with TPC, or the site itself, ceases to exist.

Why? There are so many reasons, among them the constant frustration with glitches, privacy issues, and the increasingly user-unfriendliness. Facebook used to be fun and welcoming, but now it’s, well, too big to bail.

Here’s another reason now! One that just broke!

FB attacked

And just when I thought I couldn’t get more exasperated, this new report from Citizens for Tax Justice made me seethe all over again:

Earlier this month, the Facebook Inc. released its first “10-K” annual financial report since going public last year. Hidden in the report’s footnotes is an amazing admission: despite $1.1 billion in U.S. profits in 2012, Facebook did not pay even a dime in federal and state income taxes.

Instead, Facebook says it will receive net tax refunds totaling $429 million.

Facebook’s income tax refunds stem from the company’s use of a single tax break, the tax deductibility of executive stock options. That tax break reduced Facebook’s federal and state income taxes by $1,033 million in 2012, including refunds of earlier years’ taxes of $451 million

Think Progress notes that “this tax preference for corporations costs the U.S. about $2 billion in revenue per year.”

And the wealth gap widens…

As does my dis-”like” of Facebook.

Washington Post Upchuck Teaser of the Day: “Is Mitt Romney Loosening Up?”

Your Daily Dose of BuzzFlash at Truthout, via my pal Mark Karlin:

So the Washington Post today touts a story which is so full of fluff, it makes cotton candy look like a nutritious meal. The e-mail teaser for the story is “Is Mitt Romney loosening up?” The story itself is headlined, “Mitt Romney receives newfound enthusiasm from Republicans.” Now that could be an accurate assessment, if it weren’t for the purely anecdotal and cliched structure of the story. [...]

Mitt Romney is still awkward sometimes, a bit robotic and stilted at the lectern. But a turnabout seems to be happening: Voters say they are seeing him through a new prism.

“He’s not stiff. He’s letting his own human nature through, talking like you and I are talking now, not guarded and watching what he’d say,” Marge Sowa, 69, said of the Republican presidential candidate after sizing him up at a pancake breakfast in Brunswick, Ohio, during his tour of potential battleground states. “He showed personality – oh, big time. He was one of the guys.”

And then there’s the perennial “regular guy” paragraph:

In a New Hampshire park, he scooped ice cream (mostly vanilla); along a Pennsylvania highway, he stopped by a Wawa convenience store for a meatball hoagie; in Ohio, he served pancakes at an apple orchard on Father’s Day; and along the Mississippi River in Iowa, he went on a riverboat cruise and briefly took the steering wheel for a photo op.

[...]

On page two of the Post article it makes this admission:

Romney’s advisers say that little has changed about the candidate. And they are right. His speeches still are practiced odes to free-market economics. He’s still darting between dusty factories and staged rallies, with the same “Born Free” rock anthem and oversize American flags.

[...]

What it is really about is corporate media journalism that fails the needs of a nation in crisis. [...]

And Rucker reads into Romney’s mind, “The candidate wandered down the aisle to chat with reporters, confident enough now to make fun of one of his more awkward gaffes from the primaries.”

Oh, my, this is what passes for the nation’s top journalism?

Please read the whole post here.

How Can the US Solve Its Problems When the Corporate Media Has Turned Into the National Enquirer?

Your Daily Dose of BuzzFlash at Truthout, via my pal Mark Karlin:

One Weiner “confessional” news conference is worth more in advertising revenue than a year of covering our wars that have spanned a decade. [...]

The Weiner affair is just the latest example of what Chris Hedges calls “spectacle” coverage superseding the dissemination of news that informs and enlightens. [...]

The news media that is increasingly evolving into a combination of the National Enquirer, People magazine and “American Idol” has to answer to history, as America descends into a tabloid future in which only the very rich will control the mass media “news” prism.

Please read the whole thing here.

Why Does the Corporate Mainstream Media Shut Out Bernie Sanders?

Yesterday I posted about how the Sunday talk shows have ignored Senator Bernie Sanders. Our friends at BuzzFlash agree, and so I submit…

…Your Daily Dose of BuzzFlash at Truthout via my buddy Mark Karlin:

Senator Bernie Sanders (Independent-Vermont) is a long-time reader and fan of BuzzFlash.  On  June 3, his press secretary sent us the following commentary to post on BuzzFlash at Truthout. For years, Thom Hartmann, also a BuzzFlash friend, has been hosting Bernie Sanders in a Friday morning radio segment, “Brunch with Bernie.” Sanders incisively states the case for a budget that benefits all Americans, but is generally ignored by the corporate mainstream media while it crowned the radical Paul Ryan as someone presenting a “bold, courgaeous” budget.

Why is the voice of Bernie Sanders not given at least equal due in the mass media?

“Instead of ending Medicare as we know it and making savage cuts to community health centers and children’s health care programs, we must ask the top 2 percent of income earners, who currently pay the lowest upper-income tax rate on record, to start paying their fair share of taxes.”

That is a seemingly reasonable statement by Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont, in a commentary his office submitted to BuzzFlash at Truthout.

Yet, while Sanders is getting a bit more time on cable television to make his case for a budget that recognizes the need for upper-crust tax revenue increases and a reduction in the military budget, he is hardly a regular guest on national Sunday morning political talk shows. [...]

The corporate mainstream media generally “balances” the Ayn Rand extremism of Paul Ryan, for example, with a so-called “centrist” Democrat. [...]

Could it be that the corporate mainstream media generally shies away from Sanders because he threatens the gluttonous incomes of the corporations and people who own most of the mass press in America?

Please read the whole thing here.

VIDEO-BLUNT: WHAT “Librul” media?

Blunt is a lot like letters to the editor. YOUR take, short, to the point.

You have a voice, now use it.

Special thanks to Jimmy Reefercake for his lyrics and vocals on “The Pundit Bunch”:

For more information about how to contribute to Blunt, follow this link.

It’s your turn. Go.

Streaming Al Jazeera “was the work-around required by the censorship practiced by America’s corporate gatekeepers.”

Frank Rich does it again:

The Egyptian government pulled the plug on its four main Internet providers and yet the revolution only got stronger. … [A]  knowledgeable on-the-scene journalist, Richard Engel… set the record straight on MSNBC in a satellite hook-up with Rachel Maddow. “This didn’t have anything to do with Twitter and Facebook,” he said. “This had to do with people’s dignity, people’s pride. People are not able to feed their families.” [...]

What’s important is “why they were driven to do it in the first place” — starting with the issues of human dignity and crushing poverty [...]

More damning, Morozov also demonstrates how the digital tools so useful to citizens in a free society can be co-opted by tech-savvy dictators, police states and garden-variety autocrats to spread propaganda and to track (and arrest) conveniently networked dissidents, from Iran to Venezuela.  [...]  [E]ven in the case of the young and relatively wired populace of Egypt, only some 20 percent of those masses have Internet access. [...]

Unable to watch Al Jazeera English, and ravenous for comprehensive and sophisticated 24/7 television coverage of the Middle East otherwise unavailable on television, millions of Americans last week tracked down the network’s Internet stream on their computers. Such was the work-around required by the censorship practiced by America’s corporate gatekeepers. [...]

We’ve been inculcated to assume that whoever comes out on top is ipso facto a jihadist.

He covers so much more, so please go read the whole thing here.