Archive for confirmation hearings

“Republicans tellingly showed zero interest in… the 19,000 sexual assaults of military servicewomen that occur each year.”

chart rape military assault women

Today’s L.A. Times letter to the editor, because our voices matter:

Re “Hagel hearing reopens Senate wounds,” Feb. 1

By grandstanding their grievances with former Sen. Chuck Hagel for leaving the fold to serve in President Obama‘s administration as secretary of Defense, the neoconservative Republicans on the Senate Armed Services Committee rubbed salt in their own self-inflicted wounds. What a shameful spectacle of badgering, interrupting and berating a decorated war veteran with a stellar record of public service.

While wasting the day on cherry-picked policy positions that don’t even pertain to what a Defense secretary does, Republicans tellingly showed zero interest in the one that does: the 19,000 sexual assaults of military servicewomen that occur each year. Kudos to Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.) for questioning Hagel about this “invisible war,” to which he promptly and correctly pledged no tolerance.

Wendy Blais

North Hills

rape women military assault

Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) should “at least avoid the stench of hypocrisy.”

chicken hawk

Today’s L.A. Times letter to the editor, because our voices matter:

Re “Kerry easily wins Senate vote for secretary of State,” Jan. 30

Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) claims Vietnam War veteran and Purple Heart recipient Sen. John Kerry (D-Mass.) is “anti-military” and is therefore unfit to serve as secretary of State.

In so doing, Cruz, who never served in uniform, joins a not-very-exclusive group known as the “chicken hawks.” These are folks whose enthusiasm for war and all things military does not extend to their own service. Some members who may be familiar to Cruz are Dick Cheney, Rush Limbaugh, Newt Gingrich and Mitt Romney.

It might have been wiser for Cruz to have emulated Republican Sens. John Cornyn of Texas and James Inhofe of Oklahoma and admit that he wouldn’t vote for Kerry because he’s a liberal. While petty and obstructionist, this would at least avoid the stench of hypocrisy.

Kevin Smith

Newbury Park

Senators signal contentious hearing on Supreme Court nominee

Really, they’re just talking to themselves, no one out here gives a rat’s butt whether or not she was a judge.

Washington (CNN) – The leading senators on the Judiciary Committee signaled a contentious hearing on Elena Kagan’s Supreme Court nomination starting Monday, with ranking Republican Jeff Sessions of Alabama saying a GOP filibuster was possible.

“This nominee does have serious deficiencies,” Sessions said Sunday on the CBS program “Face the Nation.”

He cited Kagan’s lack of experience as a judge and what he called her liberal leanings.

“I think the first thing we need to decide is, is she committed to the rule of law, even if she doesn’t like the law?” Sessions said.

Pressed about a possible Republican filibuster against the nomination, Sessions said: “It’s conceivable a filibuster might occur.”

Committee chairman Patrick Leahy, D-Vermont, responded on the same program by noting that other Supreme Court justices including William Rehnquist and Hugo Black also had no experience as judges before taking their high court seats.

Elena Kagan Watch: You know what they say about the size of a man’s government…

Heaven forbid the Kagan confirmation hearings are about, you know, her:

At Supreme Court confirmation hearings, the nominee is usually the star. But Elena Kagan may well be a supporting player in a drama featuring two men not even there: President Obama and Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr.

With an eye on the midterm elections, Democrats will use Ms. Kagan’s hearings, which begin Monday, to put the Roberts court on trial by painting it as beholden to corporate America.

“Beholden” doesn’t even begin to describe it. The Roberts side of the Supremes is to Big Biz as Rich Lowry is to Barbie McLipSchmutz.

You know what they say about the size of a man’s government…

Republicans will put Mr. Obama on trial over what they view as his Big Government agenda, and will raise questions about whether Ms. Kagan, his solicitor general and former dean of Harvard Law School, is independent enough to keep that agenda in check.

By all means, keep that big, bad government in check. We wouldn’t want them regulating, oh I dunno, Big Oil now would we?

Sometimes size matters.

Rahm Emanuel Predicts Big Battle Over Supreme Court Pick


Bring it on. Fracking R’s have a knuckle buster coming to them. Via Taegan-

The other news from White House chief of staff Rahm Emanuel’s fascinating interview with Charlie Rose last night — other than he wants to be Chicago’s mayor — was his prediction that there will be a big battle over President Obama’s upcoming Supreme Court nomination.

Said Emanuel: “I think that there’ll be a huge, huge battle… I think the President will obviously appoint a person that he thinks is appropriate and right for the Supreme Court, as he laid out the kind of criteria in the Justice Stevens model. I think if people took a fresh look at that, I don’t think it has to be that type of battle. But we may be at a system and a time in which we have that type of battle.”

First Read is a bit skeptical noting “we haven’t had a real SCOTUS battle since Clarence Thomas in 1991, and the current vacancy is swapping one liberal (John Paul Stevens) for probably another liberal (whomever Obama picks).”