Archive for Christian evangelists

Video- Fox Falsely Claims Obama Administration Leading “Christian Cleansing” Of Military

Can’t type well enough to really go after this bull. Expect some serious rants when I become two fisted again. Via.

Evangelical leaders agree with President Obama, say U.S. is not a Christian nation

Via Sodahead

You know how Christian conservatives have been all over President Obama for saying this back in 2006?

“Whatever we once were, we are no longer a Christian nation – at least, not just. We are also a Jewish nation, a Muslim nation, a Buddhist nation, and a Hindu nation, and a nation of nonbelievers.”

Yes, they were all frothy and pitchforky because the president “threatened” their idea of the United States of Christians by acknowledging our diversity. Or as I like to call it, the truth.

You know who else calls it the truth? Evangelical Christian leaders.

Heads exploding in 5…4…3…2…

Via the L.A. Times:

In a statement issued Tuesday, the National Assn. of Evangelicals said that when it surveyed selected evangelical leaders about whether the United States was a Christian nation, 68% said no.

Much of the world refers to America as a Christian nation, but most of our Christian leaders don’t think so,” said Leith Anderson, the association’s president. “The Bible only uses the word ‘Christian’ to describe people and not countries. Even those who say America is a Christian nation admit that there are lots of non-Christians and even anti-Christian beliefs and behaviors.”

The association said that some respondents to its June survey said, in essence, that “perhaps the United States was a Christian nation, but it is no longer.” Others rejected the idea of that a nation can be “Christian” altogether.

Animated VIDEO: If Newt Gingrich is nominated, “it would be electoral suicide for the Republicans.”

Via Next Media Animation:

“If the evangelicals nominate Gingrich, it would be electoral suicide for the Republicans.”

And wouldn’t that be a crying shame? Tsk tsk.

Rick Santorum’s terrible, horrible, no good, very bad English, but Christian conservative leaders back him anyway

I have a pet peeve. When I see public figures (Okay, and not so public figures. Okay, and sometimes even friends.) use egregiously bad grammar or mispronunciate (yes, that was intentional) or invent words, like “misunderestimate” or “pundints” or “nu-kew-lar”, it drives me a little nuts.

I can’t help it, it’s been ingrained in me since I was a kid. I had an excellent education, and for that I owe my teachers a huge debt of gratitude. And while I am, admittedly, critical, I make plenty of mistakes, too, and often use twisted grammar or invented words as a writing device.

But I expect more from certain people, especially leaders who hold themselves up as role models or stress their own superiority and that of those who are just like they are over Americans who they imply are “less than.”

So anyway, there I was, minding my own business, reading a couple of CNN articles about how Christian conservative leaders voted to support Rick Santorum and how Rick Santorum’s latest pitch was to warn voters that President Obama would “destroy” Willard Romney in November. I got to the end of the second piece and the following jumped out at me:

[Santorum] plans to make Romney his main target.

I think there are difference between me and Gingrich but frankly there are bigger differences between Romney and I than Newt and I,” he said.

Between me and Gingrich“? “Between Romney and I… Newt and I“?

Well, this may explain one thing: Why Santorum attacked the president for suggesting that American kids going to college was a good thing… although you’d think after earning three degrees of his own, he would have learned to speak English properly. Especially if he thinks it should be the official language of the United States.

And by “English” he means lousy English. You know, like the kind Rick Perry uses.

Keep ‘em uninformed and uneducated, right Ricky? That’s the only way the GOP can win… other than through enormous undisclosed corporate donations, fixing voting machines, and voter suppression, I mean.

Speaking of informing the electorate… 

We’re anticipating a busy election year, and we want to make sure that we are here getting out the bestest and fastest news every single day until President Obama is reelected.

It’s fundraising time, so PLEASE CONSIDER DONATING so we can keep posting:

If everyone who stopped by just dropped some spare change in the pretty yellow PayPal bucket, we could wrap this thing up today and devote the extra time to outing the lies the RWNJ’s are raining on our heads.

You can donate at any time by using the PayPal donate buttons in the sidebar or above, or if you need a snail mail addy, feel free to email thepoliticalcarnival@gmail.com.

In addition, if anyone wants to sponsor us for three months with an ad in the sidebar, please email Paddy. Since it’s an election year, any ad will be getting increased views.

Please, though, never forget that we truly appreciate you guys with or without the donations. Every single day.

Video- God speaks to Rick Joyner & Jim Bakker through thunder

Jim Bakker? JIM FREAKING BAKKER is still shilling? Man, it takes strong stomachs to watch this slime, so kudos to Right Wing Watch.

Conservative “church sluts”

 

Penn Jillette has an op-ed in today’s L.A. Times that is worth a read. His premise is that religion and politics don’t mix (sound familiar?) and that the magic word should be “American”, not “Christian”:

[T]he whole problem comes down to the word “Christian” and what it has come to mean in my lifetime. … People didn’t start self-labeling or getting labeled Christian until the last part of the 20th century. [...]

When [John F. Kennedy] finally got around to talking about religion, here’s what he said: “I believe in an America where the separation of church and state is absolute.” Can you imagine a presidential candidate talking that way today? …[T]he modern use of the word Christian was pushed to fight Roe vs. Wade. The anti-choice people wanted a big-tent word for the religious objection to abortion, and that meant they had to bring all the Protestants and Catholics together if they wanted to claim God for their team. The word Christian did that.

Exploiting and politicizing Christianity have continued to cheapen religion, of course, but unfortunately these days, that’s become commonplace and, even worse, acceptable.

Jillette goes on to discuss Michele Bachmann’s remarks about natural disasters sending a message from her god to politicians ears, something he said “was disgusting and not generally Christian at all. But her blasphemous message was delivered on the news as just that.”

Leave it to the media.

Then he moved on to Rick Perry and his merry band of apostles:

When Perry did his big apolitical political rally in August, he was very careful to call it nondenominational. It was Christian. Now let’s watch Mitt Romney as he works on trying to convince Americans that his sect, with its magic underwear and its belief that the Garden of Eden was in North America, really is just another Christian offshoot.

I’m not sure I agree, considering Willard M. Romney couldn’t convince a dog to pee on a fire hydrant. Hey Willard, who let the flip-flops out?

Let’s just hope our politicians keep expanding the group of people they want to serve. Rather than embracing Christian as the magic word of politics, we can move on to the truly magical word: American. And maybe we can even go a step further and make the magic word “humanity.”

As of now, sadly, I’m not sure that hope has a prayer.

Note: The “church sluts” reference in the blog title is from the op-ed.

“When did the Bible of the conservative Christian become so un-Christian?”

The other day I posted the second in a series about how the Christian right is making a concerted effort to register 5 million like-minded voters and how formerly apolitical pastors are speaking out on politics in their churches. (Meet “the congregational version of the ‘tea party’” and “Our goal is to raise up a body of believers & that they elect a lot of godly leaders.” And Silicon Valley is helping.) I suggest you read both posts.

With that in mind, here is today’s L.A. Times letter to the editor, because our voices matter:

On Christians

Re “Silicon Valley gives a boost to conservative Christians,” Sept. 16

I don’t know which Bible technology entrepreneur Ken Eldred reads, but when he says, “I personally believe that someday we’re gong to stand before God, and he’s going to pull out a ballot and say, ‘How did you vote in this election?,’ “ my God would approve of the answer, “I voted for the guy who talked about feeding the homeless, clothing the naked and caring for the sick and not for the guy who was only worried about deficits, tax benefits for the rich and executions.”

When did the Bible of the conservative Christian become so un-Christian?

Mike Danahy
Hollywood