Archive for cable news channels

Why I didn’t watch the Sunday talk shows today

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email

yell at tv

I made the mistake of turning on “Meet the Press” today. I lasted about seven minutes before screaming at the Tee Vee Machine and turning it off. The entire seven minutes was similar to what happened here: “Does this open the president up for criticism? Will critics have new ammo? Well, will they, huh? Huh?” #LibrulMediaMyAss

All I heard was Benghazi Benghazi Benghazi, criticism of the president over the Boston bombings, and then more hyperventilating about anything else that ever existed within the vast political scope of all things Obama. BAD Obama. FAILURE Obama. INEPT Obama. LEAD FROM BEHIND Obama. BLAME Obama.

I’m fine with healthy, constructive criticism, but this is out of control. There is no more news. News died when it was swept into the greedy, self-serving world of commercialization. What we have now is any excuse to create controversy, to even create a non-existent news story, in order to ramp up the ratings.

What better way for corporate-owned media to achieve higher Nielsens for their beloved corporate sponsors than to bash Obama, ignite passions, beat the drums for war, and scare viewers so that they’ll glue themselves to the screen to catch the next BIG, SCARY CHYRON!

chyron syria cnn

chyron syria abc

But back to the Benghazi Noise Machine. Today, Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-UT) claimed that President Obama’s administration is threatening and intimidating witnesses, but he couldn’t even back up his claim:

But hey, that’s okay, people watched, some pointed and laughed, and some even mistook his warped opinion for fact. Key word: Watched. What more could a news program hope for? Oh wait, that was Fox, not news.

I previously posted a video of a segment in which Chris Hayes said this on his “All In” show:

“Question mark.” You know, there is this thing we do in cable news. Sometimes magazines do it too. You want to grab someone’s attention but the thing you want to say is just too irresponsible to get away with or stand behind. So, for example, maybe I want to say, in discussing Lindsey Graham’s demagoguery in constitutional due process, “Lindsey Graham, comma, Constitution hater.” So no, instead what we would say is, “Lindsay Graham, Constitution hater?” Since you are asking a question, you don’t have to stand behind what you are asserting.

And then, as if on cue, MSNBC displayed a chyron only a few minutes ago that read, “Lame duck already?” Since they asked, allow me to respond: “Idiotic question chyron?” Question mark?

chyron blitzer dept of jihad

chyron fox question scott brown

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email

Steve Kornacki to host MSNBC’s ‘Up’

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
(Steve Kornacki (Photo by: Heidi Gutman/MSNBC))

(Steve Kornacki (Photo by: Heidi Gutman/MSNBC))

“Up” is on too early for me regardless of who hosts it. I think it should have been co-hosted by Joy Reid and Ari Melber, myself. Kornacki is already co-hosting a show, which obviously prepared him for “Up”. Maybe now Ari or Joy will end up as a regular on The Cycle now.

But what do I know?

From the “Up” site:

MSNBC has named Steve Kornacki the new host of its weekend morning show Up.

Kornacki, previously a co-host of MSNBC’s The Cycle, replaces Chris Hayes who had hosted the show since 2011. Hayes will move into MSNBC’s weekday 8 pm slot beginning April 1, while Ed Schultz begins a new weekend evening program, the company announced last week in a series of programming changes.

Up airs Saturdays and Sundays from 8 to 10 am Et.

All the best, Steve, knock ‘em dead!

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email

Quickie– MSNBC headline: “Conclave mania!” Enough already.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email

pope chimney seagull

Today’s Quickie:

Will someone tell me why MSNBC is treating the Popey Changey thing as a coming attraction trailer for a movie or a promo for a new reality series?

I flipped over to the cable news network during a break from the Stephanie Miller Show on Current. My bad. They introduced the “Selection of the Pope” segment with choir voices singing over a bright white graphic of the heavens, complete with sun rays and white fluffy clouds. I can’t recall the title, but the overall impression I got was of a glossy pre-Oscar ad.

Shortly thereafter, this headline appeared in BIG BOLD LETTERS across the screen:

CONCLAVE MANIA!

Seriously. This is what cable news has come to.

Via art.1stdibs.com

Via art.1stdibs.com

That was today’s Quickie. Will you still respect me in the morning?

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email

“MSNBC’s move to veer to the left” puts it ahead of CNN, “Meet the Press” has lost 25% of its audience

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email

msnbc lean forward

The L.A. Times Calendar section has an article out today about Patricia Fili-Krushel, the new chairman of the NBCUniversal News Group, which includes NBC News, MSNBC and CNBC. The piece concentrated mostly on the “Today” show, but at the end, there was this:

Fox News dominates the cable news landscape, but MSNBC’s move to veer to the left of the political spectrum has firmly entrenched it in second place ahead of CNN. The financial news channel CNBC remains very profitable despite increased competition from Bloomberg TV and Fox Business.

Still, there are other holes to be patched. “Rock Center,” the prime-time news magazine that Williams anchors, is struggling. “Meet the Press,” too, has fallen behind CBS’ “Face the Nation” and has lost more than 25% of its audience since 2008. NBC insiders downplay the decline at “Meet the Press,” arguing that the audiences for Sunday morning shows are so small that it has little bearing on the bottom line.

High on Fili-Krushel’s to-do list is building NBC’s digital presence, particularly mobile, as part of an effort to get younger viewers who typically steer clear of broadcast news. “I have 21- and 22-year-old kids,” she said. “They do not watch linear TV.”

Three noteworthy points:

1. MSNBC’s “move to veer to the left” pushed it ahead of CNN. That’s a big deal, especially in light of all that nonsense about this being a “center right” country, which has once again been thoroughly debunked. Are you listening, Comcast?  How about giving Ari Melber, Joy Ann Reid, Lizz Winstead, Stephanie Miller– among others– a shot at their own shows? Call me crazy, but I’m willing to bet they’d up the ratings even  more.

2. “Meet the Press” is losing its audience. Surprise! Gee, how could that be happening, especially with such a host who regularly avoids tough follow-up questions to Republicans, lets his guests get away with lying and/or refusing to answer questions directly, and hosts way more right-leaning guests than (moderate to conservative) Dems, and very few real liberals (scroll)?

3. Younger viewers “typically steer clear of broadcast news.” That’s a great point. How do we expect younger voters to make informed choices if they aren’t aware of what’s going on around them? I can vouch for this depressing phenomenon as I wrote back in 2009 in a post titled “Teen Idles” that I hope you’ll read:

Tabloid infotainment has replaced serious news, as I’ve mentioned in post after TPC post. As a result, the osmotic nature of how teens learn about their own world has been reduced to sound bites from the most inane, splashy, celebrity-driven stories.

So many lessons to be learned here, so little time.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email

Random Thoughts: Ari Melber and Joy Ann Reid should co-host their own show

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email

random thoughts smaller

Visit NBCNews.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Random thought of the day:

If you could cast any host(s) for a new political talk show, who would you choose? After observing some of the regulars on the Tee Vee Machine who range from too wonky and boring, to not charismatic enough, to not progressive enough, to why in the world is this person even on TV, I’ve concluded that I should never watch television again.

No. Wait. That’s not what I was going to say at all.

What I was going to say is that if I were a big corporate executive with a ton of money and power and a beckoning slot at 4 pm PT during which Hardball reruns were airing, I’d cast two of my faves: Ari Melber (@AriMelber) and Joy Ann Reid (@TheReidReport).

I’ve had communication at one time or another with both of them, and they are just as bright and shiny and likable as they are on air. They consistently exude professionalism along with good humor and have perspectives and insights that keep me coming back for more. Nor do they bore me. Nor do I wish they’d lighten up or serious down. Nor do I want to do an Extreme Makeover on either of them. Nor cringe when their names are mentioned.

And when they’re on shows together, it works.

Both have subbed for regular hosts on MSNBC, so they’re practiced, ready, and good to go. Hence– and yes, I just wanted to say “hence”– they should co-host their own show. And please, not at some ungodly hour Pacific time *coughCHRISHAYEScough*

So who would be your choice?

ari melber joy reid

Here’s a tandem random thought: Add Lizz Winstead to the mix. I know her personally and adore her, and her humor, humanity, and wicked sharp analyses have more than earned her a regular spot. And don’t get me started on her resume.

Lizz Winstead

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email

MSNBC Rising

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email

Andy Marquis, reporter for RACE22.com, is our guest blogger of the day. He used to consider himself a Republican but not any more.  He changed his voter registration to Independent in 2011 and says that’s how it will remain.

Here’s his latest guest post. I don’t agree with everything he said here, such as equating Rachel Maddow with Bill O’Reilly (she relies on facts and is civil and fair to her guests, for example, so apples/oranges), nor do I think for a minute that MSNBC is a liberal network. But just as Current does, it gets kudos for hiring progressives to host their own shows, and that is a vast improvement over other cable stations (bolding mine):

MSNBC Rising

In the past few years, there’s been a shift in the direction NBC’s cable news network, MSNBC, has taken.  For one, the network has built an identity which has been missing for years.  As a result of the decision to become the anti-FOX, MSNBC’s become more progressive… and their ratings have progressively increased.  It’s symbolic of a demographic and ideological shift going on in the United States.

“During the first week post-election, MSNBC’s “The Rachel Maddow Show” at 9 p.m. ET and “The Last Word with Lawrence O’Donnell” at 10 p.m. ET were both #1 in the A25-54 demo, topping both Fox News Channel and CNN,” a press release from MSNBC stated. “For the week of November 12-16, Maddow was #1 with 480,000 A25-54 while FNC’s “Hannity” was second with 439,000 A25-54 and CNN’s “Piers Morgan Tonight” placed third with 181,000 A25-54. “The Last Word with Lawrence O’Donnell” at 10 p.m. had 396,000 A25-54. FNC’s “On the Record w/ Greta Van Susteren” was second with 362,000 A25-54 and CNN’s “Anderson Cooper 360” was third with 178,000 A25-54.”

MSNBC’s rise has been building up for some time.  For much of its time on air, MSNBC existed as a back marker, even with innovative programs like A Region in Conflict on its air.  It was in 2003, during the Iraq war, that MSNBC began phasing in a new nightly news broadcast that would become the hallmark of its lineup, “Countdown with Keith Olbermann”.  A couple years later, after the failures following Hurricane Katrina, Olbermann orated an on-air essay, “The City of Louisiana”.  Olbermann became more outspoken against the Bush Administration and his show quickly took a left turn and, as it did so, his ratings increased.  The writing was on the wall.

MSNBC progressively began its transformation in to the progressive network it currently is, hiring people like Rachel Maddow, Ed Schultz (who would later replace Olbermann), Lawrence O’Donnell, Reverend Al Sharpton and Alex Wagner.  They changed their morning strategy, after Don Imus was fired for racially insensitive remarks made towards the Rutgers Women’s Basketball Team.  With that came the birth of Morning Joe which has become one of the most influential programs in American public policy.

With a new slogan that debuted in 2010 (“Lean Forward”), a new weekend strategy and a new dayside strategy, MSNBC’s transformation was complete.

That takes us to last week, and several other weeks prior to that.  MSNBC has had victories over FOX News Channel in terms of ratings but they’ve been few and far. There’s been no denial, FOX is the heavyweight and nobody can top them.  However, Rachel Maddow and Ed Schultz are doing just that, and it speaks volumes about the changing demographics.

Maddow and O’Donnell won the Age 25-54 demographic, or as networks refer to it, “the money demo” but still were behind in overall numbers.  FOX’s ratings and the sudden relegation of Hannity and Van Sustren almost look like the Republican Party’s relegated status in American politics.  FOX’s audience appears to be genuinely older than MSNBC’s audience.  FOX appears to have a problem bringing in a new generation of viewers, kind of like the Republican Party has a problem bringing in a new generation of voters.

See, MSNBC and FOX both speak ideologically to certain sides of the American electorate.  Rachel Maddow has quickly become to liberals what Bill O’Reilly is to conservatives.  MSNBC eloquently defines the progressive talking points just as FOX defines the conservative talking points.

There are fundamental differences though – differences that favor MSNBC.  Shows like “NOW with Alex Wagner” and “The Cycle” are younger, give a voice to both sides in a way shows like “The Five” and “America Live” try to but don’t achieve.  Perhaps the viewers are tired of one side being shouted down (as is the case on “The Five”) in the same way as the voters are tired of the lack of civility in Washington, DC.

The rise of MSNBC represents a seismic shift in American television news, and it should not be ignored.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email

TV ratings for second debate good news for President Obama

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email

The Hollywood Reporter:

Early ratings for cable network coverage of Tuesday’s presidential debate have numbers surging ahead of the first showdown between President Obama and Mitt Romney earlier this month.

More people watched an energetic, sharp-as-a-tack, prepared President Obama kick a testy Willard M. Romney in his lying binder.

More people watched as Romney’s lies were exposed.

More people watched Romney’s usual awkwardness and discomfort, especially after having to learn how to sit on a stool for the occasion.

More people watched an unpresidential, defensive, petulant Mitt Romney interrupt moderator Candy Crowley while showing similar disrespect for the President of the United States.

More people watched and realized that the more they watched, the less they believed the Romney sales pitch.

More people watched President Obama win. But “don’t gloat! VOTE!”

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email