Archive for battleground states

Texas GOP Chairman: State could become a battleground in 2016.

FacebookTwitterRedditDiggStumbleUponTumblrLinkedInPinterestEmailShare

bluish you don't look bluish

Texas GOP Chairman Steve Munisteri believes Texas could become a swing state in 2016 if Hillary Clinton runs, but that Republicans will be up to the challenge. He takes the prospect very seriously, and unlike some in his party, he is refusing to dismiss it.

Real Clear Politics:

In an interview with RCP, [Texas GOP Chairman Steve Munisteri] said that he has long taken seriously the possibility that Texas could become a battleground as early as 2016, particularly if Clinton becomes the Democratic standard-bearer.

“If she’s the nominee, I would say that this is a ‘lean Republican’ state but not a ‘solid Republican’ state,” he said. “I don’t know anyone nationally who’s scoffing at this. The national party leadership is aware and tells me they’re taking it seriously.

Munisteri said that he has had recent discussions with Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus about the need to prepare for a significant change in the political dynamic here, noting that the need will likely become even more pressing in the next decade. That’s when Texas is expected to see its minority population rise more sharply -- as it adds as many as four additional electoral votes to make it an even shinier target for Democrats than it already is.

Republicans better brush up on their shiny new fake-big tent talk before anyone realizes they don't mean a word of it.

FacebookTwitterRedditDiggStumbleUponTumblrLinkedInPinterestEmailShare

Poll-itics: President Obama leads Mitt Romney in 12 battleground states

FacebookTwitterRedditDiggStumbleUponTumblrLinkedInPinterestEmailShare

NPR poll:  Mitt Romney is ahead by one point nationally, but President Obama leads 50% to 46%, in 12 battleground states: Nevada, Colorado, New Mexico, Iowa, Wisconsin, Michigan, Ohio, Pennsylvania, New Hampshire, Virginia, North Carolina and Florida.

FacebookTwitterRedditDiggStumbleUponTumblrLinkedInPinterestEmailShare

Poll-itics: President Obama leading Mitt Romney in Florida, Virginia, Ohio, Minnesota, and Colorado

FacebookTwitterRedditDiggStumbleUponTumblrLinkedInPinterestEmailShare

Ruh-roh, Willard. The polls aren't swing-stating your way. NBC/Wall St. Journal polls show that among likely voters, President Obama leads 49%-44% in Florida, 49%-44% in Virginia, and 50%-43% in Ohio.

And a Public Policy Polling poll shows the president leading in Minnesota 51% to 44%.

Did I mention Colorado? An OnSight Public Affairs/Project New America survey has President Obama leading Mitt Romney by 49% to 44%.

FacebookTwitterRedditDiggStumbleUponTumblrLinkedInPinterestEmailShare

Mitt Romney’s playing field is experiencing shrinkage

FacebookTwitterRedditDiggStumbleUponTumblrLinkedInPinterestEmailShare

As has been reported, for now at least, Republican super PACs have pulled their resources from Michigan and Pennsylvania. At first I saw that as good news for Team Obama, but then I wondered if the Romney campaign will just blitz those states in the future. I'm no strategist or expert in these things, so your guess is as good as mine.

And of course, I am always wringing my hands over voter suppression, which could keep hundreds of thousands from the polls.

Jonathan Chait offers some encouraging insight, but I'm still only cautiously optimistic at this point:

Romney is targeting eight states: Nevada, Colorado, Iowa, Ohio, Florida, North Carolina, Virginia, and New Hampshire. No Wisconsin, Michigan, or Pennsylvania. This is surely not because Romney is husbanding scarce cash.  [...]

The reason this looks worrisome for Romney is that he’s pursuing an electoral-college strategy that requires him nearly to run the table of competitive states. ... If you play with the electoral possibilities, you can see that this would mean Obama could win with Florida alone or Ohio plus a small state or Virginia plus a couple small states, and so on.

Unless I’m missing something badly here, Romney needs either a significant national shift his way — possibly from the debates or some other news event — or else to hope that his advertising advantage is potent enough to move the dial in almost every swing state in which he’s competing.

Or else to hope that disenfranchising voters will achieve what his money can't.

FacebookTwitterRedditDiggStumbleUponTumblrLinkedInPinterestEmailShare

Poll-itics: President Obama leads Mitt Romney in Florida, Ohio and Wisconsin swing states

FacebookTwitterRedditDiggStumbleUponTumblrLinkedInPinterestEmailShare

Via Taegan:

New Quinnipiac/New York Ttimes/CBS News polls of likely voters finds President Obama leading Mitt Romney in three crucial swing states.

Florida: Obama 49%, Romney 46%

Ohio: Obama 50%, Romney 44%

Wisconsin: Obama 49%, Romney 47%.

Guess why? Hint: Medicare. Taegan has more.

FacebookTwitterRedditDiggStumbleUponTumblrLinkedInPinterestEmailShare

Poll-itics: No bounce for Romney from Paul Ryan pick, loses ground in Florida, Colorado

FacebookTwitterRedditDiggStumbleUponTumblrLinkedInPinterestEmailShare

Via the L.A. Times:

Two more national polls out Wednesday confirm what scattered early data had suggested – Republican presidential hopeful Mitt Romney is not seeing much of a boost in the polls as a result of his pick of a running mate.

And a poll of battleground states also showed very limited movement, with Romney gaining a little ground in Ohio and Virginia, but losing some in Florida and Colorado. In all cases, however, the shifts were within the poll’s margin of error. [...]

One other cautionary note: A big bounce caused by picking a running mate would not necessarily be a good sign for a candidate, nor is its absence necessarily a problem. In Gallup surveys, neither Obama nor John McCain received a significant  bounce from their pick of a running mate. In the 1996-2004 campaigns, the two picks that generated the biggest boost in the polls were Bob Dole’s choice of Rep. Jack Kemp in 1996 and Al Gore’s choice of Sen. Joe Lieberman in 2000 being the most successful. Both of those tickets, of course, lost.

But hey, it's still psychologically better than seeing his numbers tick up significantly.

FacebookTwitterRedditDiggStumbleUponTumblrLinkedInPinterestEmailShare

DNC announces new bus tour to stalk Romney

FacebookTwitterRedditDiggStumbleUponTumblrLinkedInPinterestEmailShare

What goes around (and around and around and honks... right Team Romney?) comes around:

(CNN)The Democratic National Committee is rolling out another bus tour to trail Mitt Romney's own over the weekend through key battle ground states, harping on the Republican candidate's economic policies as throwing "the middle class under the bus."

The DNC tour will last for four days and make stops in Virginia, North Carolina, Florida and Ohio between Friday and Monday...

The bus debuted Thursday parked, as a not-so-subtle jab, outside the Republican National Committee headquarters in Washington. The tour, called "Romney Economics: The Middle Class Under the Bus," will mirror Romney's travel plans over the weekend.

America often needs "not-so-subtle jabs" to wake them up. Willard Romney wants to cut taxes for wealthy people like himself and raise them for the middle class, got that voters?

ABC- The tax-hike claim comes in large part from a study by the Independent Tax Policy Center that concluded Romney would have to roll back deductions popular with the middle class—on mortgages and dependent children, for instance—in order to pay for his proposed $5 trillion tax cuts, much of which would go to the wealthiest Americans.

Yup, Romney’s plan would raise taxes on middle class. Hence, "Romney Economics: The Middle Class Under the Bus" is based on truth and is a consistent message, as opposed to Romney's dishonest talking points and desperate campaign tricks:

Visit NBCNews.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

 

FacebookTwitterRedditDiggStumbleUponTumblrLinkedInPinterestEmailShare