Archive for atheism

“It is proselytizing to atheists whenever a deity is given official recognition by a government body.”

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email

atheist barbie smaller

Today’s Los Angeles Times letter to the editor, because our voices matter:

Re “Prayers in public offices,” Editorial, May 21

As a 75-year-old taxpaying citizen who has served in the U.S. Army, and as an avowed atheist, I take issue with any manifestation of religion in any government office or proceeding. I keep my thoughts about religion to myself; is it asking believers too much to do the same?

If those who are devotees of any deity wish to be publicly acknowledged, then why not have a moment of silence for reflection without any specific reference to religion? Those who have a god could still pray, while others could contemplate as they choose.

It is proselytizing to atheists whenever a deity is given official recognition by a government body. Reverse this practice, or allow messages disavowing religions to be spoken.

Maurice Sparks

Los Angeles

church state Religion and Politics

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email

Study: Packages Sealed with ‘Atheist’ Tape 10x More Likely to Disappear in the Mail

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email

From Time

Reading this story makes me want to go right out and order ‘Atheist’ shoes (which I didn’t even know existed until now). I’ll ask the company to send them without the ‘Atheist’ packing tape, though, so that I actually get them. No, this is not an ‘April Fools Day’ story. The Atheist Shoes website:

AtheistShoes

Do employees of the United States Postal Service have a bone to pick with atheists? A study by a German company that crafts atheist-branded footwear claims they do — and that the USPS is “losing” packages outright.

Atheist Shoes calls itself ”a cadre of shoemakers & artists in Berlin, Germany” that hand-make artsy shoes for “people who don’t believe in god(s).” The company describes its shoes as “Bauhaus-inspired,” referring to a German crafts and arts school that operated in the early 20th century, eschewing ornamentation and emphasizing harmony between an object’s function and design. The company also claims to have “lots of customers” in the United States.

Read more here:

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email

VIDEO: Pat Robertson thinks I “want you to be miserable.”

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email

This from Pat Robertson, the man who censored the words “toilet paper” in one of the hundreds of squeaky clean jokes I wrote for a space alien character for his squeaky clean Family Channel:

“It’s, well, Christmas all over again. The Grinch is trying to steal our holiday. It’s been so beautiful, the nation comes together, we sing Christmas carols, we give gifts to each other, we have lighted trees, and it’s just a beautiful thing. Atheists don’t like our happiness, they don’t want you to be happy, they want you to be miserable. They’re miserable, so they want you to be miserable. So they want to steal your holiday away from you.”

Funny thing about that, Pat. I’m an atheist who loves to celebrate the holidays any number of ways, including Christmas trees, pie, chestnuts roasting on an open fire, Jack Frost nipping at my nose, those yummy cookies covered in powdered sugar, plenty of wine, piping hot cider, matzo ball soup, and holiday love for all! Go figger.

Nor am I miserable in the least or wish misery on anyone else (well, maybe a select few who cause others harm). As for “stealing” anyone’s holiday, I’m not sure how that’s even possible. In fact, I’ve always shared holidays, having been brought up Jewish and somehow still enjoy diversely decorating our house with Chanukah dreidels, twinkly lights, fragrant firs and wreaths, snowmen, and Stars of David galore.

If anyone has had holidays “stolen” from them, it is those who fall into the growing category of America’s religious minorities, those who are discriminated against and/or hated for believing something different from the Christian majority, those who don’t believe at all (and currently have a snowball’s chance in hell of ever becoming a U.S. president), or those who would like to be permitted to have their own public religious displays instead of being excluded in favor of endless Nativity scenes, tree lightings, and Santas. Or people like President Obama who are told they are not Christian at all, but Muslim, as if that’s bad thing.

But this isn’t a war, and Christmas is alive and well and warm and lovely and sparkly. And a little too commercial, but hey…

Or maybe non-inclusive Pat the Grinch with all his “Christian values” was projecting. After all, his words don’t sound very joyous to the world or do-unto-othersy, do they?

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email

CHART: “The younger generation is abandoning God in droves.”

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email

TPM provides the details. Here’s a sample:

The younger generation is abandoning God in droves. [...] The results suggest that a new movement of atheist or agnostic thinking during the the last decadespearheaded by high-profile authors like Richard Dawkins, Christopher Hitchens and Sam Harris — is steering younger people away from traditional beliefs long held by their parents.

This suits me just fine since I’m an atheist and get tired of all the religious talk, especially from politicians these days. There seems to be more of that than ever, with one candidate trying to out-God the other, or critics who judge President Obama, Willard Romney, or anyone else who doesn’t believe in their particular god.

Faith is personal. I won’t push my atheism on others, and others should refrain from imposing their faith on me or anyone else.

With social media being so prevalent and, as TPM said, high profile atheists becoming more prominent on the Tee Vee machine and elsewhere, the young ‘uns have more exposure to those who they might not have only a few years ago, as well as more opportunities for open discussion.

And communication is something I can truly believe in.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email

Unprovoked, partiers allegedly threw bottles at black students, evoked Trayvon Martin. Gotta rant.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email

Allegedly…

HuffPo: Cornell Chief of Police Kathy Zoner confirmed that people were “reportedly making racial references” and throwing bottles from the roof of Sigma Pi. She added that she could not disclose more information because the investigation, which is being led by Ithaca Police, is ongoing.

Beverly Fonkwo ’14 said she was walking home with a friend when, unprovoked, the group on the fraternity roof began throwing objects that landed near a group walking behind them. [...]

When they asked them to stop again, the group responded, “‘Come up here, Trayvon,’ and started making all these other racial comments,” Fonkwo said.

I’ve had it. This story triggered all kinds of pent up feelings. GottaVent. I’m stumbling through stream-of-consciousness and high emotions here, so if it’s a little clumsily worded, please just go with it:

Why anyone ever in the history of ever anywhere thinks it’s a bad thing to be black, gay, Mexican, Jewish, Native American, or any damned thing but lily white and male is simply astounding to me in this day and age.

Why does the color of anyone’s skin, the protective covering that keeps our organs from spilling out, make a difference to #%@&*! anyone else?

How does pigmentation make one inferior or superior to anyone else?

How does pigmentation make one more threatening or stupid, savage, or beast-like?

How does lack of pigmentation automatically make one superior in any way, shape, or form?

How does consensual, adult love of another adult human being make one a pervert or child molester?

How can the expression of mutual love and/or passion between two consenting human beings be deemed illegal anywhere, any time?

How and why is wanting a lifelong, monogamous relationship, including the same marital status as other humans, immoral or illegal?

How does one’s belief in their version of their god make them suspect or inferior?

How does one’s belief in their version of their god make them superior, morally or in any other way?

How does one’s non-belief in a superior being make them inferior, amoral, or unfit in any way?

Why are non-believers unable to be so much as considered as possible presidential candidates?

Who the hell is anyone to judge another anyone solely based on their hue, orientation, nationality, belief, or any other deeply personal, involuntary, or birth-oriented trait or other natural, newly discovered, evolving, or acquired identification? That was really awkward, but you get what I mean.

And where does anyone get off using violence to express disdain or disapproval?

And where does anyone get off expressing disdain or disapproval to begin with?

And finally, why must every not-necessarily-offensive word out of everyone’s mouth be so politically correct that we are forced into a pre-emptive duck-and-cover posture of self-censorship?

Rant over. For now.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email

Move over “people of faith”: “I suggest that we atheists and agnostics be referred to as ‘people of evidence’.”

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email

Today’s L.A. Times letters to the editor, Part 2, because our voices matter:

The problem is too many people

Re “The greening of faith,” Opinion, Feb. 27

Encouraging as “green” trends within some religions may be, none appears inclined to address the root problem spurring environmental degradation: rampant overpopulation of the planet.

Indeed, certain religions seem hell-bent (as it were) on disproportionately propagating their adherents’ numbers. Catholicism and Mormonism famously encourage large families. How illuminating, that two GOP presidential candidates — Rick Santorum, a Catholic, and Mitt Romney, a Mormon — between them have fathered 13 children.

If all couples followed these candidates’ improvident examples, the Earth’s population would triple in a generation. Enlightened environmentalist voters should shun them both.

Gary Dolgin

Santa Monica

***

I keep hearing political candidates and pundits refer to religious folks as “people of faith,” as this Op-Ed article does.

So I suggest that we atheists and agnostics be referred to as “people of evidence.”

Brent Meeker

Camarillo

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email

VIDEO: Pat Robertson Warns of “Atheist Dictatorship”

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email

He says this like it’s a bad thing:

Every time I hear my former employer* speak, all I can think of is Jim Ward’s impression of him.

Here’s a comment from under the video at YouTube:

Hey, lets start an atheist paradise, a haven if you will & make sure it’s a gated community who’s sacred edicts are reinforced by capital punishment, banishment, flame ,or torture.

Wait a second…

EntinludeX

*I was hired by a production company at CBS to do some work for The Family Channel, writing hundreds of jokes for an alien character who visits, and is confused by, earth (these were to be used as bumpers for TFC). One of the things I thought would perplex him was a roll of unfurling toilet paper, so I submitted a joke to that effect.

It was rejected. Why? The words “toilet paper” were unacceptable to Pat Robertson.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email