Archive for Andrea Mitchell

VIDEO– Chris Matthews: “Is that something women really worry about? Men being brutal? In the home.” Uh, yes.

are you kidding me

Visit NBCNews.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

As they have non-stop, the talking heads on MSNBC have been discussing a Hillary Clinton run for president in 2016 (enough already!). Chris Matthews is no exception:

And while many may think this was Hillary’s coming out party for 2016, it was Biden who may have stolen the show, many say.

He and Andrea Mitchell– who sounded nearly as flabbergasted as I felt– were having a conversation about it when this jaw-dropping Moment of WTF happened:

Matthews:

Is that close to the bone? The idea of wife beating some old f… or beaters?

Mitchell:

It was part of it.

Matthews:

Is that something women really worry about?

Mitchell:

Yes.

Matthews:

… Men being brutal?

Mitchell:

… The Violence Against Women Act–

Matthews:

…In the home. In the home.

Mitchell:

Yes. domestic violence.

wtf girl

Yes, Chris, domestic violence. As in the Violence Against Women Act that you covered last May and as late as March 21st of this year:

MATTHEWS: What does he think he`s accomplishing the minute people notice that the wine tastes like the old stuff or they notice that whatever it is, it`s still what it was? What are they going to do? They`re not going to join the Republican Party.

SCHRIOCK: No, they`re absolutely not, particularly — you talk about young people, you know, we talk about women — there`s been a continuing growing gender gap. And they still are just pushing policy after policy — the Ryan budget, devastating to women and families, Violence Against Women Act — it took a year-and-a-half to get it reauthorized.

Yes Chris, domestic violence is real and it really worries women. And yes, Chris, “men are brutal in the home, in the home.” I can personally attest to that, as can millions of other women. You didn’t know that? Seriously? That’s news to you? Because if it is, then you’re in the wrong business.

Here is the entire segment:

Visit NBCNews.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Brief encounter with Mr. & Mrs. Alan Greenspan: “Chairman Greenspan, how’s that trickle-down economics working for us?”

Photo by @Rousseau_ist

Photo of Andrea Mitchell in limo by @Rousseau_ist

Yesterday I posted Source– John McCain on economic inequality: “I don’t care, nobody cares.” That story was about and by one of my Twitter pals, @rousseau_ist, who came face to face with John Sidney McCain at the Alfalfa Club where he asked, “Senator McCain, what your your thoughts on the current state of economic inequality?” His response:

“I don’t care, nobody cares.”

Of course he didn’t care. He has eleventy-two homes and is married to Mrs. Wealthypants.

Today Rousseau sent me the sequel to that story. This one involves Alan Greenspan and his wife Andrea Mitchell. It was another brief encounter that I will let him to describe in his own words:

MSNBC DC Bureau Chief Andrea Mitchell dove into her limo at the Alfalfa Club billionaires annual pow wow Saturday Jan. 26th, stranding her feeble husband to find his own way to the opposite side of the vehicle. Former Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan hunched over, appearing confused, is finally helped to the other door.

As they came towards me, I ask, “Chairman Greenspan, How’s that trickle-down economics working for us?” ~ I would have offered an explanation as to how it was working for us, but I felt badly for him. (Imagine that) ~ Here is a guy barely able to stay on his feet and his wife expects a busy doorman to assist her husband. They people have the nerve to say poor people feel “entitled.”

This was my moment of being discreet by not bullying a husband and wife I can’t stand more than most individuals in this country.

Photo of Alan Greenspan by @Rousseau_ist

Photo of Alan Greenspan by @Rousseau_ist

VIDEO– Andrea Mitchell to Haley Barbour on election-rigging schemes: Are Republicans “trying to game the system?”

gerrymandering states electoral college changes

Visit NBCNews.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Andrea Mitchell:

“What about the electoral college… to make them proportional… If it were done nationally, Mitt Romney would have been taking the oath of office

Barbour:

“States have the right to do that… “

Mitchell:

Doesn’t this make it look as though the Republicans are trying to game the system? Isn’t it a bad tactic for the Republican party to take… ?

Barbour:

“I don’t know how you can ask that question when you in the immediate previous breath told me that the Republicans aren’t even gonna let it out of committee…  Maybe there’s somebody in Virginia who happens to be a Republican, but when some Democrat offers some stupid legislation that the Democrats won’t let out of committee, usually the Democratic party doesn’t have to answer for what can’t get out of committee.”

Mitchell:

“… Other states are proceeding: Republican legislatures in Michigan, in Pennsylvania, in Ohio are proceeding with it. I’m just asking, is this the right move for the party nationally?”

Barbour:

“Well as I said, I would not be for it. I don’t think there’s any sort of national movement, and you’ve sort of convinced me that in Virginia, there may not even be any state movement, it may be an isolated legislator…. But I think it is wrong to judge it that there is some big Republican conspiracy to try to change this.”

No state or national movement? What about this? And this:  Finally! WaPo front-pages election-rigging scheme. Plus, glimmers of hope in Virginia, Florida.  And this via HuffPo:

One of Michigan’s top Republican lawmakers is interested in a proposal to change the way the state allocates its electoral college votes, in a way that would have handed Michigan to Mitt Romney in the 2012 presidential election despite the fact that he received a minority of the popular vote.

On to common sense gun safety proposals…

Mitchell:

The Supreme Court has already ruled in the Heller case that there can be exceptions, that the DC gun law was unconstitutional but other assault weapon bans might not be unconstitutional, so the Constitution does not preclude other restrictions on guns and background checks and other measures that are being considered and that have widespread support. Do you think that Republicans should take a closer look at some of these other options in the aftermath of Newtown?”

Barbour then started babbling about “mentally ill, deranged people,” or as I call it, Haley Barbour.

FYI, here is a back story on what Mitchell and Barbour were discussing at the top of the video:  Why Bobby Jindal is aiding and abetting the transformation of the GOP into “the stupid party”  

Rick Perry: Laws? Pfft! Pray for kids instead; Gun nut: Reagan for gun laws due to Alzheimer’s; US likes Obama AND stricter gun laws

guns cartoon clay bennett

tweet dupuy reagan guns

Link

Erich Pratt of Gun Owners of America was on MSNBC with Andrea Mitchell. As I watched it live, my jaw dropped as he suggested that Ronald Reagan only supported gun control in “his later years” because his Alzheimer’s made him do it.

That’s pretty low, Pratt, even for you.

I thought I had misheard. I hadn’t. Via Think Progress:

Pratt:

President Reagan owned an AR-15.

Andrea Mitchell:

And he supported gun control. And he advocated for it.

Pratt:

In his later years. I think we have to keep that in account.

Mitchell:

In his later years he was almost killed by John Hinckley.

Pratt:

But all through his presidency he opposed gun control, that’s my point.

 frustrated smaller

Here’s the entire segment. Watch at your own risk, and have some Valium handy:

Visit NBCNews.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

but wait there's more

Rick Perry’s solution to gun violence? What else? “Pray for our children.” That sure has worked out well so far, hasn’t it? Here’s his full statement in a press release:

Gov. Rick Perry released the following statement regarding President Obama’s executive actions:

“The Vice President’s committee was appointed in response to the tragedy at Newtown, but very few of his recommendations have anything to do with what happened there.

“Guns require a finger to pull the trigger. The sad young man who did that in Newtown was clearly haunted by demons and no gun law could have saved the children in Sandy Hook Elementary from his terror.

“There is evil prowling in the world – it shows up in our movies, video games and online fascinations, and finds its way into vulnerable hearts and minds. As a free people, let us choose what kind of people we will be. Laws, the only redoubt of secularism, will not suffice. Let us all return to our places of worship and pray for help. Above all, let us pray for our children.

“In fact, the piling on by the political left, and their cohorts in the media, to use the massacre of little children to advance a pre-existing political agenda that would not have saved those children, disgusts me, personally. The second amendment to the Constitution is a basic right of free people and cannot be nor will it be abridged by the executive power of this or any other president.”

Two things, Ricky: One, nobody is abridging the Second Amendment. Americans would still get to hang on to their firearms, just not the military assault style ones that “were created to spray the enemy… because it was ineffective to assume young soldiers could become marksmen…” And two, the hidden history of the Second Amendment? It was about “slave control.”

Okay, three things. As I said in a previous post:

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

Tyranny isn’t mentioned. A militia is. Regulation is. A well-regulated militia is.

Not the freedom to spray innocent Americans with bullets, not overcompensation for personal insecurities, and not keeping the gun industry’s and politicans’ pockets stuffed with currency. Those aren’t mentioned in the Second Amendment.

Neither is prayer.

By the way, per a new TIME/CNN poll, Obama’s job approval jumped, public favors stricter gun laws: 55% of Americans now approve of the job Obama is doing as President, compared to 43% who disapprove. That ratio mirrors the public appetite for tighter restrictions on guns, with 55% of respondents favoring stricter gun control laws and 44% opposed.

Stick that in your high capacity magazine, gun zealots.oops rick perry smaller

VIDEO- Andrea Mitchell to MI Gov. Rick Snyder: “This is not what you campaigned on.” Snyder: Union busting is “pro-workers!”

Visit NBCNews.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Andrea Mitchell:

“This is not what you campaigned on.”

King Ricky Snyder:

Hey! union busting “is pro-workers! It’s a good thing! This is a positive thing for unions!”

The “Right-to-work” (aka right to work for less) measure passed in the Michigan Legislature and the King of Michigan will sign it as early as tomorrow. This means that unions cannot require members to pay dues as a condition of employment.

Record numbers of pro-union protesters, as many as 15,000 stormed the Capitol in cold, snowy weather.

On MSNBC, David Corn said this issue won’t go away, the anger and protests will only grow over the next year.

The L.A. Times:

But even as the Rev. Jesse Jackson rallied protesters on the steps of Lansing City Hall, labor leaders were hurriedly seeking ways to reverse the legislation down the road.

Michigan can’t go the way of Ohio, where a referendum last year reversed legislation that would have restricted collective bargaining. Michigan’s right-to-work legislation is attached to an appropriations bill, meaning it can’t be reversed by referendum. Also, it may be too risky to wait and go the way of Wisconsin, where litigation continues after a judge struck down parts of a collective bargaining law.

However, in Michigan, there is an option of a “statutory initiative,” which would be permitted if opponents of the bills can collect enough signatures to equal 8% of the votes cast in the last gubernatorial election, union leaders say. A so-called veto referendum could be triggered by collecting signatures equal to 5% of the votes cast.

A statutory initiative would allow voters to cast a ballot on right-to-work legislation in November 2014, when Gov. Rick Snyder, who has said he would support the legislation, will be up for reelection.

Unions are the Democrats’ biggest source of fundraising and a powerful voice of support, which is exactly why Snyder and other Republicans want to destroy them. As you can see by the graphic above, corporate donations far exceed union spending, so without those groups to help out, Dem money dries up.

We need them.

Let’s also remember to thank unions for the 36 ways they’ve improved our lives.

(Carlos Osorio/Associated Press)

VIDEO- Alan Simpson on “Grover-Babe” Norquist: “He will be irrelevant. This guy is a zealot. He knows the game is up.”

Visit NBCNews.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Andrea Mitchell interviewed former Senator Alan Simpson today, who had a thing or two to say about a thing or two about Tax Cut Dictator Grover Norquist’s increasing irrelevance, or as I like to call it, shrinkage.

Mitchell:

Do you have any impure thoughts about Grover Norquist?

Alan Simpson:

Plenty. But you know, here’s a good guy with a very bad idea and he was gathering up those signatures back in the ’80s and the early ’90s when inflation was zip, when unemployment was zip, and anybody who would sign anything before they come to Congress and hear the debate and participate in it hopefully and get in to the floor, management and the amending process and the conference committee, those people I mean why would you do that? It’s like selling your soul!

Now Grover, I said, would be irrelevant in two years, and I say that– he’s got about another year and a half to go– he will be irrelevant. This guy is a zealot. A zealot is one who, having forgotten his purpose, redoubles his efforts, and he sees the crumbling of the great house of cards.

It’s like Jarvis out in California back in the late ’70s. He’s left schools destitute, he’s left institutions destitute. You can’t come in and play this kind of a game when everything has changed in America, and this time everything has changed because it’s all coming to pass on December 31st, and Grover-babe is losing a person a day and he knows it. So what does he use to cover that? Cutesies. Little smart Alecs. I know that. I don’t know who else does that. I have done that.

He is becoming irrelevant. And you can see it in his eyes. He knows the game is up. Because good people of good faith have decided that instead of being Republicans, or Democrats, they’re Americans. And instead of being beholden to Grover Norquist and the AARP, they’re beholden to the United States of America. Those guys are going to take their lumps.

Here’s the entire segment:

Visit NBCNews.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

VIDEO: Rep. Jason Chaffetz claims Romney auto bailout ad that’s filled with lies is “100% correct & accurate.” Team Obama responds.

Visit NBCNews.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Rep. Jason Chaffetz told Andrea Mitchell that Mitt Romney’s completely misleading and desperate ad is “100% correct and accurate.”

The ad claims that the auto-industry rescue caused Jeep production to be “shifted” to China. That was an outright lie, as my previous post, Chrysler: Romney is wrong, Jeep is not leaving for China. “It’s a leap that would be difficult even for professional circus acrobats” pointed out.

As Mitchell reminded Chaffetz, Chrysler spokesman Gualberto Ranieri disagreed:

Despite clear and accurate reporting, the take has given birth to a number of stories making readers believe that Chrysler plans to shift all Jeep production to China from North America, and therefore idle assembly lines and U.S. workforce. It is a leap that would be difficult even for professional circus acrobats. Let’s set the record straight: Jeep has no intention of shifting production of its Jeep models out of North America to China…”

Ranieri went on to say, “A careful and unbiased reading of the Bloomberg take would have saved unnecessary fantasies and extravagant comments.”

Here’s the video of the Romney ad, which, again, is full of lies.

Ben LaBolt told reporters that Team Obama will air a response to Team Romney’s Jeep ad. UPDATE: Here it is:

:

Voiceover:
“When the auto industry faced collapse, Mitt Romney turned his back. Even the conservative Detroit News criticized Romney for his ‘wrong-headedness’ on the bailout. And now, after Romney’s false claim of Jeep outsourcing to China, Chrysler ITSELF has refuted Romney’s lie. The truth? Jeep is ADDING jobs in Ohio.”

Voiceover:
“Mitt Romney on Ohio jobs? Wrong Then.

Mitt Romney:
“Let Detroit go bankrupt.”

Voiceover:
“Dishonest Now.”