Archive for Alaska

AK Rep. Don “Young’s Republican Party should not think that Americans like myself will be swayed by outreach.”

outreach my ass reach out inclusive

For the back story, see this previous post: VIDEO: The “stupid party,” er, Republicans blast GOP Rep. Young for his “wetbacks” comment.

don young wetback comments immigration

And with that, here is today’s L.A. Times letter to the editor, because our voices matter:

Re “Republican apologizes for slur against Latinos,” March 30

As an American with a Hispanic last name, reading the story of the Alaskan member of Congress using the term “wetback” brought back childhood memories.

I grew up in San Antonio, a predominantly Hispanic city, on the mostly white north side of town. Any time I heard “wetback,” it made me uncomfortable because of the view underlying it: I and the people like me were less than everyone else. Passing off using the term as just the common vernacular of a bygone era doesn’t fool anyone.

For Don Young (I don’t respect him enough to call him a congressman) to speak in those terms so easily betrays an ingrained view of Hispanics. Young’s Republican Party should not think that Americans like myself will be swayed by outreach.

Andrew Ximenes

Los Angeles

All our other GOP “outreach” posts can be found here.

VIDEO: The “stupid party,” er, Republicans blast GOP Rep. Young for his “wetbacks” comment

gop stupid party jindal don young wetback comments immigration

Alaska Rep. Don Young:

“My father had a ranch; we used to have 50-60 wetbacks to pick tomatoes.”

House Speaker John Boehner, per CNN:

“Congressman Young’s remarks were offensive and beneath the dignity of the office he holds. I don’t care why he said it – there’s no excuse and it warrants an immediate apology.”

Republican National Committee chairman Reince Priebus:

Our party represents freedom and opportunity for every American and a beacon of hope to those seeking liberty throughout the world. Offensive language and ethnic slurs have no place in our public discourse.”

Is Priebus kidding? Does he have no awareness of what his party has said and done to diminish the dignity and rights of not-white people and how all too many conservatives still refer to them (scroll)?

Rep. Young:

I used a term that was commonly used during my days growing up on a farm in Central California. I know that this term is not used in the same way nowadays and I meant no disrespect.

Psst! Don! It’s 2013.

Psst! Don! Your statement, excuses, and non-apology have now been documented and will be available for review forever.

CNN:

The word is widely considered an ethnic slur and generally refers to those from Mexico who come to the United States illegally by crossing the Rio Grande River. It was used by the government in the 1950s for “Operation Wetback,” a massive crackdown on illegal immigration along the U.S.-Mexico border.

Let’s take a gander at the ol’ GOP playbook, shall we?

1950s mentality:

check mark smaller

 

 

 

Slurs:

check mark smaller

Massive crackdown on immigrants:

check mark smaller

How’s that reachy-outy thing workin’ for ya?

outreach my ass reach out inclusive

UPDATE via Think Progress:

By Friday afternoon, Young had issued a full apology:

“I apologize for the insensitive term I used during an interview in Ketchikan, Alaska. There was no malice in my heart or intent to offend; it was a poor choice of words. That word, and the negative attitudes that come with it, should be left in the 20th century, and I’m sorry that this has shifted our focus away from comprehensive immigration reform.”

VIDEO: “Shell sent two rigs to go try to drill in the Arctic, and both rigs went ker-splat!”

shell oil maddow show

ker splat

Visit NBCNews.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Via the L.A. Times:

Plagued with problems with both its drilling rigs and its oil spill containment vessel, Shell Alaska announced Wednesday that it will not conduct offshore drilling operations in the Alaska Arctic this year.

The decision to “pause” Arctic drilling during the upcoming ice-free months of summer will allow the company to repair and retool its troubled rigs and prepare for future operations in a program that has already cost the company nearly $5 billion.

Rachel Maddow:

“So Shell was the only oil company deemed ready enough to start drilling in the Arctic, to start drilling in this pristine environment where we have not allowed drilling in the past. Shell was the only company given the go-ahead by the U.S. government.

Shell sent two rigs to go try to drill in the Arctic, and both rigs went ker-splat!

And then today Shell said, ‘You know what? Forget it. We’re out. We can’t do it.’”

“And given Shell’s mess up there… the Interior Department is right now doing an emergency review of whether Arctic drilling can be done safely at all.”

“What happens next in this industry is anybody’s guess.”

To repeat, what does it take? We were lucky this time, no spill, no leaks… that we know of.

Here’s the back story:

Multiple safety, environmental violations on another Shell Alaska Arctic drilling rig

That Shell Arctic drilling “emergency plan”… What could possibly go wrong?  

Dep’t. of What Could Go Wrong? More headaches for Shell Alaska’s new offshore drilling program in US Arctic

VIDEO: Now what? Arctic offshore drilling, a broken oil rig. “What if the same problems had been encountered miles away?”

VIDEO: Big Oil is neither competent nor capable of safe drilling in the Arctic. Period.

bp maddow showoil geyser maddow show

Multiple safety, environmental violations on another Shell Alaska Arctic drilling rig

what does it take

What does it take? Previously:

That Shell Arctic drilling “emergency plan”… What could possibly go wrong?  

Dep’t. of What Could Go Wrong? More headaches for Shell Alaska’s new offshore drilling program in US Arctic

VIDEO: Now what? Arctic offshore drilling, a broken oil rig. “What if the same problems had been encountered miles away?”

VIDEO: Big Oil is neither competent nor capable of safe drilling in the Arctic. Period.

It’s bewildering that the Obama administration and Drill-Baby-Drillers still take risks with the world we live in, a world that needs care, not abuse. Sadly, corporate profits are a priority and lobbyists who apply so much political pressure triumph way more often than they should.

When will they learn that they and their families are as vulnerable as anyone else who inhabits this planet? Family values? Yeah, right. “Pro-life”? Don’t make me laugh.

How many more of these reports, like this one from the L.A. Times, will it take to convince those who insist on drilling that clean energy (“clean” coal is not clean, by the way, and the Keystone XL Tar Sands Pipeline is a disaster-in-waiting) is the only feasible solution if Mother Earth is to survive?

The U.S. Coast Guard has found evidence of multiple safety and environmental violations in Shell Alaska’s Noble Discoverer Arctic drilling rig and forwarded it to the U.S. Justice Department for a decision about possible civil or criminal penalties, authorities confirmed Friday.

The news is the latest setback for Shell’s troubled Arctic drilling program… It has been plagued with logistical and mechanical troubles that raise questions about the company’s ability to continue this year. [...]

The Coast Guard found a lack of preventive maintenance and “systematic failure” led the Discoverer to experience a loss of its propulsion system and an explosion in its exhaust system, according to a letter to Shell’s president from U.S. Rep. Edward J. Markey (D-Mass.) that detailed 16 reported deficiencies. [...]

The violations appear to be serious enough that Coast Guard officials in Alaska said they have referred the case to the Justice Department for review.

VIDEO: Alaska Republicans think the idea of civil unions for gay couples is funny, burst out laughing

separate but equal gay marriage civil unions

The Republican-led House Majority Caucus in Alaska thinks civil rights are a real knee-slapper, especially for those icky gay people who have– ew!– sex and stuff. Because that’s what this is all about: gay sex. Not lasting relationships, not commitment, certainly not equal rights, but– ew!– sex.

Towleroad has the appalling video:

Alaska’s Republican-led House Majority Caucus really gave had themselves a good laugh on Friday, when Mark Miller from the Juneau Empire asked if their upcoming initiatives include civil unions or domestic partnerships to same-sex couples.

Miller:

I’m looking at a recent Public Policy Polling survey of Alaska that found that only 30 percent of respondents believe there should be no legal recognition of gay couples’ relationships in Alaska. I was just curious, would the caucus support the idea of having domestic partnerships or civil unions open to same-sex couples?

(giggles, laughter)

House Leader Lance Pruitt:

“…We focused on the things that really allow people to have a great lifeWe didn’t have a discussion here about what happens inside your home. We had a discussion here about whether you can make money, whether there’s a great economy, and whether or not you’re going to have the opportunity to live in Alaska with a great future. Now, your discussion on that, we didn’t talk about that. I’ll be straight, we didn’t talk about that particular issue… It wasn’t something that came up in our discussion.

Ohhh, I see, they want to “allow people to have a great life”… unless they’re gay.

In case you didn’t catch the eleventy times Pruitt mentioned it, civil unions JUST DIDN’T COME UP.

And as he suggested (subliminally), he’ll “be straight,” see, because, in case you may have thought otherwise, HE’S NOT GAY.

Are Republicans trying to become obsolete, or are they truly so dense that they cannot recognize what’s happening to their own party? The GOP can’t stop losing, and a big, thick, juicy, new, improved Civil War is infecting the Republican Party.

VIDEO: Big Oil is neither competent nor capable of safe drilling in the Arctic. Period.

Via Mark Fiore/San Francisco Chronicle

Via Mark Fiore/San Francisco Chronicle

Visit NBCNews.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Previously:

That Shell Arctic drilling “emergency plan”… What could possibly go wrong?  

Dep’t. of What Could Go Wrong? More headaches for Shell Alaska’s new offshore drilling program in US Arctic

VIDEO: Now what? Arctic offshore drilling, a broken oil rig. “What if the same problems had been encountered miles away?”

Please read those posts, and then watch the video. As opposed to fossil fuels, green energy doesn’t cause widespread damage or death to living things. The wind and the sun don’t pollute our waters, wildlife refugees, and seas. They don’t leak radioactive waste or filthy, toxic oil, they don’t threaten millions of people’s lives nor do they threaten Mother Earth.

Yes, they have their problems, but please, compare and contrast. Drilling in the frigid, monster seas where emergency aid can be ineffective is a disaster waiting to happen. And for all we know, one is about to.

Rachel Maddow:

“Shell currently has two rigs in operation in the Arctic. The one on the left is the one that just ran aground off the coast. The one on the right is now as of today reportedly the subject of a criminal investigation. CBS news reporting tonight that the U.S. Coast Guard has opened up a criminal investigation into that Shell rig as a result of, among other things, serious issues with the ship’s safety management and pollution control systems.

And we’re supposed to trust these mega corporations and the Drill Baby Drill “pro life” Congress members who pocket their money?

yeah right

VIDEO: Now what? Arctic offshore drilling, a broken oil rig. “What if the same problems had been encountered miles away?”

stop the madness

Visit NBCNews.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Previously:

That Shell Arctic drilling “emergency plan”… What could possibly go wrong?  

Dep’t. of What Could Go Wrong? More headaches for Shell Alaska’s new offshore drilling program in US Arctic

The Coast Guard had to evacuate the crew of an oil drilling barge off the coast of Alaska after engine troubles on its tow vessel left the barge drifting.

Then, the Coast Guard got itself into a pickle while trying to help the Shell rig that was stuck in monster seas.

I ended the second post with:

Tell me again, Obama administration and Drill-Baby-Drillers, why the hell we’re taking risks like this? Something about corporate profits and lobbyists and political pressure was it?

Today, from Bloomberg:

This week’s grounding of a rig off the coast of Alaska adds to a series of mishaps in Royal Dutch Shell Plc (RDSA)’s seven-year quest to tap the vast oil reserves of the Arctic and emboldened critics who say it can’t be done safely. [...]

The Kulluk’s grounding caps a series of episodes that have dogged Shell’s effort to tap Arctic oil. Environmental groups today said they would ask President Barack Obama to suspend all current and pending Arctic drilling permits until operators prove they can work safely in the region’s harsh conditions.

“This string of mishaps by Shell makes it crystal clear that we are not ready to drill in the Arctic,” Charles Clusen, director of National Parks and Alaska Projects for the Natural Resources Defense Council, said on a conference call. “Shell is not Arctic-ready. We are asking the Obama administration to immediately put a hold on all permitting activities.”

applause gif

And from an L.A. Times editorial:

The grounding of the Kulluk occurred within 50 miles of a major Coast Guard facility, allowing for a quick response. But what if the same problems had been encountered 800 miles away? In just the first season of Royal Shell’s Arctic operations, the region already has proved to be a far more perilous place for oil exploration than proponents foresaw. The rigs probably should not head back to the Arctic seas this spring; federal regulators will be endangering a valuable and fragile environmental resource if they don’t reexamine what’s needed to drill safely under the most challenging conditions.

Why is it that the powers that be somehow manage to ignore the obvious or are so astonished when the “unexpected” occurs. Many of us predicted this, or worse, could happen, so it comes down to this: When will profits finally take a back seat to reality… and the sanctity life?

At what price do we continue this insanity? We’re endangering living things and the health of the planet.

This is fast becoming my mantra: “Pro-life” my ass.