Archive for air force

Fort Hood Is Front For Military Whorehouse

FacebookTwitterRedditDiggStumbleUponTumblrLinkedInPinterestEmailShare

military prostitutes

Last week Senator Kirsten Gillibrand's (D - New York) proposed a bill to overhaul military sexual-assault policies, taking these cases out of the military's hands and putting them in civilian court failed. This was mostly accomplished by Republicans nay votes. It came five "yeas" short of the 60 needed to overcome a filibuster.

So was this really needed? A resounding YES!!!

For starters, here's why. Raw Story--

Ft. Hood sexual assault prevention coordinator accused of running prostitution ring

A Fort Hood Army sergeant, who coordinated the post’s sexual assault and harassment prevention program, faces multiple charges after he allegedly set up up a prostitution ring involving cash-strapped female soldiers.

So the man responsible for overseeing the sexual assault and  harassment program turns out to be the base pimp, running a whorehouse. How convenient.

According to ABC News, Sgt. 1st Class Gregory McQueen was charged Friday with 21 counts related to pandering, conspiracy, maltreatment of a subordinate, abusive sexual contact, and adultery and conduct of a nature to bring discredit to the armed forces.

If no changes are made to the military laws right now, this man's future falls into the hands of his fellow soldiers. He's reported to his next highest officer in rank. And if that soldier is a friend of his, or doesn't want to prosecute this case, it could ultimately be dropped. 

Another Fort Hood soldier, Master Sgt. Brad Grimes was court-martialed in the case and convicted in December for conspiracy to patronize a prostitute and for solicitation to commit adultery. Grimes was subsequently reprimanded and demoted.

Sgt. McQueen remains suspended from his duties but is free pending trial.

That could and would never happen in civil court. If found guilty in civilian courts, these guys would be doing time.

So is Gillibrand's bill important to bring back up? You bet. And maybe it's this military case that will be the deciding factor by those military bought and paid for Senators to vote "yes" next time around. If we don't want to see the military become a government whorehouse, steps need to be taken. This could just be the straw that broke the pimp's back.

FacebookTwitterRedditDiggStumbleUponTumblrLinkedInPinterestEmailShare

ALL Is Okay in Oklahoma

FacebookTwitterRedditDiggStumbleUponTumblrLinkedInPinterestEmailShare

Oklahoma Air Force BaseYou know how some people see the glass as half empty while others see it as full. Well, there's a universal solution to this age old dilemma. Don't see the glass at all. Such is the case in the Sooner State, Oklahoma.

Mary Fallon is the governor of one of four hold-out states, firmly against recognizing same sex marriage in the military. She even points out that it's the law in her state that same sex marriages are prohibited, so she feels she's in the right there.  Okay, I can see her dilemma. State vs. Federal. There's definitely a difference of opinion. But in this case, the military, including the National Guard falls under a larger umbrella of the Federal Government. Oh, the National Guard may be state controlled, but it's final orders must be approved by the Federal Department of Defense. Just ask all of those guardsmen and women who are serving over in Afghanistan right now. Their states didn't call them up, the U.S. did.

Despite a reprimand from Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel expounding the military rules now fully accept and acknowledge same sex marriages, the individual states can't discriminate against them and must let all military, including the national guard, have full access to all military services and benefits. Anything less would be discrimination.

This didn't fall on deaf ears in Governor Fallon's state, which BTW is home to six military bases (including two Coast Guard - yup, in this land-locked state).

Sister, er, Governor Mary F's totally against discrimination. So she took immediate action. She's not going to single out same sex marriages and legal civil unions. She's going to restrict state services to ALL marriages, straight or gay. So now, if you're stationed in Oklahoma, and have a legal  marriage or civil union, NO SERVICES by the state will be provided for you or your family. The governor has spoken. There will be no discrimination in her state. If you're married to anyone of any gender, you're out of luck. Single soldiers don't have to worry. They can still utilize state facilities under their military identification.

You gotta hand it to Marriage-minded Mary. In her spite of being told what to do against her will, she's not only lopped off her nose but also her entire head. She's a total moron. Here's how the wonderfully apoplectic Rachel Maddow summed it all up.

Visit NBCNews.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

FacebookTwitterRedditDiggStumbleUponTumblrLinkedInPinterestEmailShare

How The GOP Is Turning It's Back On Our Military?

FacebookTwitterRedditDiggStumbleUponTumblrLinkedInPinterestEmailShare

statue of liberty

On the statue of Liberty, poetess Emma Lazarus' words are engraved:

“Give me your tired, your poor, Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free, The wretched refuse of your teeming shore. Send these, the homeless, tempest-tossed, to me: I lift my lamp beside the golden door.”

These are the words that greeted immigrants since it was officially dedicated October 28, 1886. Just look at those words. Republicans, how can you forget the meaning? And it's not just immigrants who are the tired, poor, huddled masses. They're not the only ones who are homeless and tempest-tossed. Did you ever hear of U.S. MILITARY VETERANS?

For years, if you played a game of word association, when you heard the word Republican, the first word to come to mind -- military. Republicans never saw a war they didn't like, or prosper from. Yet to fight a war it takes soldiers. The GOP adores them while they're serving in uniform, but turn their backs when they've finish their tours of duty. They're discarded like a used, snot-filled tissue.

Veracity Stew:

Nearly each and every day we hear about scores of them who end their own lives due to their inability to bear the pressures of daily living when once they endured the unspeakable horrors of war. Aged, infirm, homeless, mentally unbalanced, tired, poor, and hungry, these wounded warriors –these veterans of our armed forces– have more than earned each and every citizen’s unconditional love and support. But from their fellow citizens who make up the Republican Party, they have received nothing but empty platitudes, the back of a hand, and disdainful looks of contempt.

The Republicans are working fast and furiously, not for anything important, but for destruction of our fabric, the poor and middle class. The SNAP food stamp program is under attack, with the GOP trying to cut more and more money from this "assistance" program. Well, guess who's among those "freebie grabbers?" There's over 900,000 veterans who risk going hungry if the GOP’s draconian cuts to the SNAP (food stamp) program are allowed to go into effect.

For a party that should stand for something more than a void of ideas and hypocrisy, they should be ashamed of  themselves. They hate immigrants for the harm they claim they're doing this country and the economy. GOP, you don't deserve to call yourselves Americans if that's how you feel.

The American way is to provide opportunities for individuals to earn and achieve while living in peace and free from undue oppression. We have a heart. We care for our neighbor. We believe in raising ourselves up with the carrot of  hard work will pay off with success motivating us. But we also know that when our country calls upon us, we serve. We do our best. Some even make the greatest sacrifice, our lives.

You've made it so dying for your country is kinder than coming home and facing the shelter-less, un-cared for, invisible, starving life. The rich Republicans that run and dictate policy in Washington might be well served if they went along with the Tin Man to Oz and found a heart. There's a huge void where that ticker belongs.

Let's give a helping hand to those less fortunate. Those Iraq and Afghanistan returning veteran's who along with the others sadly qualify for help. They deserve and have earned better than an crumbling bridge to live under after giving their all for the war effort.

You caused these wars. Now you have to live up to your responsibilities to care for those who fought them -- the wounded, ill, or mentally challenged. Not everyone comes home a healthy hero, but all of them are heroes. They need to be treated that way.

So let's take a look at who's holding back their aid-- highest ranking House Republicans:

House Speaker Boehner, you served all of 8 WEEKS in the military

House Majority Leader Cantor, you served 0 WEEKS in the military

House Whip Kevin McCarthy you served 0 WEEKS in the military

Chairman of the House Republican Caucus, Cathy Rodgers, you served 0 WEEKS in the military

Republican Policy Committee Chairman James Lankford, you served 0 WEEKS in the military

So there you have the Republican House leadership. These are the people who need to understand military needs. From looking at their service records, they don't have the qualifications. And to see them pushing cuts to SNAP and the 900,000+ military men and women is shameful.

It's about time someone on the GOP side in the House, someone with experience, shakes things up and starts leading, not just flapping their gums for a hopeful re-election. Time to support all our destitute. Provide medical care, food and rehabilitation. Not taking42 votes on repealing the ACA and zero for helping our veterans.

The Statue of Liberty, when closed under the Republican government shutdown, wept. Lady Liberty was brought to tears, not over lack of funding for parks, but for all of her subjects which have served her so well. Boehner and Cantor, time to raise a large hanky, let Ms. Liberty blow her nose, dry her tears, and regain her pride once again. Stop your obstructionism.

Veterans: you made them. You broke the. Now fix them.

FacebookTwitterRedditDiggStumbleUponTumblrLinkedInPinterestEmailShare

Can Time(lapse) Heal Every Wound?

FacebookTwitterRedditDiggStumbleUponTumblrLinkedInPinterestEmailShare

military

The military serve us 24/7/365 all across the world. Their's is a thankless task. When things are going well, we hardly know they are there. And when things go badly anywhere in the world, they're called upon to make sure that we as a nation are kept safe.

For doing such a life-threatening task, we should, at the very least lavish them with praise and thanks. Not that they're looking for it. But it's deserved.

Way too often we hear of the results of this constant stress that these brave souls endure and in many too many cases, the aftermath of those who crack. The human soul is fragile, and sometimes individuals crack or break. Whether this ends up being reported as an on base shooting, a suicide, a sexual attack or most commonly substance abuse, we can't desert them. We can't just turn our backs. They need support. Our support.

Returning vets are promised and need medical care, mental health counselling, reintegration therapy and understanding. Sadly our government hasn't kept up with that. Imagine we're the country with drones and satellite technology, but we still have a bulk of our returning vets records on hand prepared forms. The computerization of veterans benefits and payments lags an estimated 18 months behind. A vet returns and it's a year and a half before they are up to speed on their post release care, therapy, and promised benefits.

It's shameful.

According to the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, a count on a January night in 2012, there were 62,619 Veterans who were homeless. This is just plain wrong.

Numbers of those returning with mental, emotional or substance dependency issues dwarf those numbers. From the National Institute of Health (NIH)

Alcohol abuse is the most prevalent problem and one which poses a significant health risk. A study of Army soldiers screened 3 to 4 months after returning from deployment to Iraq showed that 27 percent met criteria for alcohol abuse and were at increased risk for related harmful behaviors (e.g., drinking and driving, using illicit drugs).

Mental illness among military personnel is also a major concern. In another study of returning soldiers, clinicians identified 20 percent of active and 42 percent of reserve component soldiers as requiring mental health treatment.

So while Paul Ryan and his GOP budget cutters try to pare back the aid given to the military, think about how much we rely on our soldiers, and how little we really give them after we've taken four years from them in life altering stress. They serve for us. They volunteer. Let's volunteer back and help them out. Support more money for returning troops. Support Veterans programs.

Here's a feel good sample of what can happen when you truly do support our returning heroes:

Tell  me he doesn't resemble Mark Walberg!

FacebookTwitterRedditDiggStumbleUponTumblrLinkedInPinterestEmailShare

"What Hitler Did Will Be Nothing Compared To What We're Going To Do"

FacebookTwitterRedditDiggStumbleUponTumblrLinkedInPinterestEmailShare

Mr Peabody's Wayback Machine

With at h/t to Andrew Meyers, a New York attorney, accountant and my cousin.

SHERMAN: "Where to today, Mr. Peabody?"

MR PEABODY: "Today, Sherman, I've set my"wayback machine" to 1948. We're going to various locations around the United States and then onto an amazing undercover operation in Israel, still then called, Palestine."

Clandestine phone calls had been going out to veteran U.S. WWII pilots. Think of this as putting together THE DIRTY DOZEN, only in this case, it was called the Mahal. They were to become the first Air Force and the last hope of this nascent country. Their mission would determine the viability and the existence of  a new independent nation -- the State of Israel. The odds were formidable but the stakes couldn't be higher. Failure would destroy their hopes of existence.

The Machal were made up of volunteer pilots, most of them American, some British. Their hush-hush mission was to defend Israel from a five prong attack -- Eqypt, Syria, Trans-Jordan, Iraq and Saudi Arabia. The coordinated efforts of this assault were sure to doom the budding Israel. Time was ticking as the five formidable enemies readied their armies. The Israeli defenses were outrageously outnumbered, but not in hopes and dreams. This was do or die and they were not going to be denied their independence. They had suffered enough already.

Messerschmitt-Bf-109-airplane-2

Israel had only four (4) airplanes as the war began. They were German (how ironic) "Messerschmidt 109's" (again ironic, remember PT 109) which they smuggled in from the Czech Republic. The fighters were assembled overnight in Tel Aviv and were never flight tested before going into battle.

The unified army had tanks, squadrons, manpower and fighter planes. How could the State of Israel stand up to that? Was this the David and Goliath story of it's time?

A preview of the documentary ABOVE AND BEYOND is below. It's really a great insight into struggles for existence and of will power over might. Enjoy:

FacebookTwitterRedditDiggStumbleUponTumblrLinkedInPinterestEmailShare

They've Got Our Sixes

FacebookTwitterRedditDiggStumbleUponTumblrLinkedInPinterestEmailShare

military spending

First it was spending $400 for a hammer that you could pick up at Home Depot for ten dollars.

Then it was $600 toilet seats which you could grab at any do-it-yourself outlet for 50 bucks.

We started questioning if the military wasn't being wasteful. Their practices of procuring what they needed was costing us a huge amount of excessive money. Dollars that could be spent on other areas, or even reducing taxes. There were murmurs of complaints.

Then we settled down after we heard from outraged congressional leaders that they would be looking into this and those practices would cease. They didn't, but we bought into it. After all, the military knows best, right? We trust them with our security so we better believe in them. And Congress had our backs, or as the military would say, they had our 6's.

Now, with the latest revelations, it seems those toilet seats and hammers were child's play. Enter the newest boondoggle. The cost of sexual assault in the military. What are you guessing, $20 Million?  $100 million? Oh, if only...

Invisible war

The failure to address sexual assault in the military is costing the U.S. billions of dollars per year, a new study finds. This, according to the business section of the Huffington Post yesterday.

The fallout from military sexual assaults cost the U.S. $3.6 billion last year, according to a recent report from the RAND Corporation, an international research organization. The estimate is based on a calculation of the cost of medical and mental health services victims are likely to seek after an incident, as well as other "intangible costs."

The report also takes into account the number of unpaid work days military sexual assault victims are likely to take off as a result of their ordeal. Those missed earnings amount to a $104.5 million loss annually for the economy, the researchers found.

The findings add to an already growing sense of urgency surrounding military sexual assaults. President Obama said earlier this year that he has "no tolerance" for such assaults after a Pentagon report found that incidents had spiked 35 percent since 2010.

The same report estimated that as many as 26,000 members of the military were sexually assaulted last year. In response, the House of Representatives recently passed a provision that would provide whistleblower protection to victims.

Once again, Congress assures us that they have our backs. So what do these outraged elected officials do? Basically nothing. They vote to keep the "chain of command" rules in order. What's the chain of command rules? A process that can result in retaliation from co-workers toward the victims and may discourage victims from coming forward. That's the way to solve the problem -- the military way. Punish the victim so they are too afraid to report the crime.  A victimized soldier reports the crime to his/her Sergeant.  Sergeant reports this to the Lieutenant who perpetrated the crime or is friends with the assaulting soldier and it ends right there. Or worse, the victim gets victimized even further.

Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.) introduced the amendment in the hopes that it would encourage victims of rape in the military to come forward and report the crimes without fear of retaliation.

But Armed Services Committee Chairman Carl Levin (D-Mich.) announced an alternative proposal. He force through his own amendment  to keep sexual assault cases inside the chain of command and require a senior military officer to review decisions by commanders who refuse to prosecute rape cases. Simply put -- the status quo.

The committee passed the substitute amendment by a vote of 17 to 9.

In other words, report the offense to your immediate superior who in many cases is the accused attacker. That's it. It's over before it even starts.

Boy, am I yearning for the days of worrying over a $600 toilet seat and a $400 hammer.  $3.6 Billion dollars? Thanks to Carl Levin  (and yes, he's a Democrat)and his cronies, who knows how high that cost will be next year?

FacebookTwitterRedditDiggStumbleUponTumblrLinkedInPinterestEmailShare

Video- Happy Birthday Krys!

FacebookTwitterRedditDiggStumbleUponTumblrLinkedInPinterestEmailShare

Reminds me of you leaving for A.F. boot training. Big hug.

Here's some other momentous things that happened on November 17th's...

FacebookTwitterRedditDiggStumbleUponTumblrLinkedInPinterestEmailShare