Opportunity knocks: Democrats name 14 "Red to Blue" House candidates

FacebookTwitterRedditDiggStumbleUponTumblrLinkedInPinterestEmailShare

democrats donkey kicks gop elephant

Democrats think they have a chance to win some House elections in tough districts, and are adding even more targets as we speak. The DCCC (Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee) looks at candidates' fundraising, organization and infrastructure goals and then offers support to those who fit the bill.

However, winning back the House of Representatives wont be easy.

Via The Hill:

The committee named 16 candidates to the program, and three more districts with multiple Democratic contenders that the party has high hopes of winning. Two of those districts are open seat contests but are currently held by a Democrat.

The priority races are short of the 17 Democrats need to win in order to regain control of the House, an uphill battle especially in a midterm year where turnout is typically more favorable to Republicans.

Uphill battle, sure, but here's the part of The Hill's reporting that is key, because it drives home the obvious distinctions between Democrats and Republicans. It's the diversity, stupid:

Of the 16 candidates in the first round of Red-to-Blue districts, 10 are women, an historically high portion of the list that the committee argues is evidence of the Democratic Party’s diversity in contrast to the GOP.

No wonder the GOP continues to do everything they can to suppress the vote. Generally speaking, the more diverse the pool of voters, the more ballots cast for Democrats.

Full lists of Red-to-Blue candidates, districts, and races can be found at the link.

While we're at it, here's an idea: Elect more Progressives. While nearly any Democrat is preferable to a Republican, Dems who don't act, speak, and cast votes as Dems can pretty much blunt any victories, even if we were to achieve our dream of a Democratically-controlled House.

When those on the right bellow about how the left controlled both Houses during President Obama's first term, they leave out the part where Dems voted with Republicans or failed to support progressive issues (women's reproductive rights, for example).

All that said, one enormous priority remains: Get Out the Vote in 2014. As they say, when turnout is high, Democrats tend to win.

FacebookTwitterRedditDiggStumbleUponTumblrLinkedInPinterestEmailShare
  • paullwolborsky

    The #GOP says stupid shit that would sink a Democrat, turning off most of American voters, yet they're still touted as the next Senate Majority. And in elections, we still see races close enough to give Phil Robertson a baby-smooth shave. I know the Creepublicans have so gerrymandered districts even Keith Haring would call the maps chaotic, but come on, really? They're doing EVERYTHING wrong, though they have been losing, why so close?

    Do we really have to conclude that America's #1 GDP is in Stupid? Is America that dumb? Uh, don't answer that.