"This is a bombshell announcement." California's San Onofre nuclear plant will be permanently closed.

FacebookTwitterRedditDiggStumbleUponTumblrLinkedInPinterestEmailShare

san onofre nuke plant

To repeat something I wrote in a previous post, I am a staunch non-fan of nuclear energy. Not only is it dangerous as hell, not only do I live relatively close to two reactors situated in earthquake country, but what really irks me is how we have no safe place to store all that extremely dangerous nuclear waste.

But now I can change that. Well, I can change one word of that. I live relatively close to one reactor now, because San Onofre is going bye-bye, and I couldn't be more relieved.

Why? Because we should always expect the unexpected:

The word “expect” keeps popping up, and that ambiguity is what makes many of us a little wary. That’s because the 9.0 magnitude was also not expected. The combo of a huge quake and a tsunami was not expected. Experts say they don’t expect a quake larger than 7.0 near the San Onofre nuclear plant, nor do they expect one bigger than 7.5 near Diablo Canyon, despite the fact that new fault lines are discovered from time to time, not to mention the proximity to the San Andreas Fault.

Nuclear Power Option

The L.A. Times (video at the link):

Anti-nuclear activists and Sen. Barbara Boxer celebrated Southern California Edison's announcement Friday that the troubled San Onofre nuclear plant will be permanently retired.

The coastal plant near San Clemente once supplied power to about 1.4 million homes in Southern California  but has been shuttered since January 2012 when a tube in its newly replaced steam generators leaked a small amount of radioactive steam, leading to the discovery that the tubes were wearing down at an unusual rate. [...]

But [Donna Gilmore, a San Clemente resident who runs a blog focused on safety issues at the plant] said she still has concerns about the waste that will be stored at San Onofre after the shutdown.

So do I.

FacebookTwitterRedditDiggStumbleUponTumblrLinkedInPinterestEmailShare
  • Jason Rowe

    The nuclear plants >couldcould< be stored 100% safe; But that would cost 5x the money (at least).

    The really, REALLY simple answer(s): Solar, Wind, Biofuel. Unfortunately, big oil, big utilities, biggreedyidiots, own our politicians....

  • Frances R

    Good news, indeed. We live near nuke plant on Artificial Island, NJ. No nukes, thank you. Plants are unsafe, outdated, not worth risk to environment.