Conservative judge: "I don't care whether it's called gun control or a gun ban. I'm for it." VIDEO ADDED.

FacebookTwitterRedditDiggStumbleUponTumblrLinkedInPinterestEmailShare

guns shooting CT via LA Times 3

Visit NBCNews.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Video added. Thank you Lawrence.

Larry Alan Burns, a federal district judge in San Diego, California, sentenced Gabby Giffords' shooter-- who murdered six including a nine-year-old girl-- to seven consecutive life terms plus 140 years in federal prison. He also wrote an op-ed that's in today's L.A. Times. He writes that Jared Loughner was only subdued after he emptied a 31-round magazine into his victims and was trying to load another.

Newtown, Connecticut murderer Adam Lanza used a semiautomatic rifle with 30-round magazines to spray bullets into his tiny human targets.

Judge Burns is a self-described conservative and gun owner who has become an Enough is Enougher and is now questioning "the social utility of high-capacity magazines" and "lamented the expiration of the federal assault weapons ban in 2004."

In his op-ed, he notes that half of the nation's deadliest shootings occurred after the ban expired, and as he also notes that the ban wasn't "all that stringent." He understands that no law will completely stop the crazies from killing, but agrees with many of us whose goal is to "be able to take the 'mass' out of 'mass shooting,' or at least make the perpetrator's job a bit harder."

He also realizes it's unrealistic to ban all guns and that, clearly, there are Second Amendment issues to contend with. However, he favors bringing back the assault weapons ban, only "with teeth."

Ban the manufacture, importation, sale, transfer and possession of both assault weapons and high-capacity magazines. Don't let people who already have them keep them. Don't let ones that have already been manufactured stay on the market. I don't care whether it's called gun control or a gun ban. I'm for it.

I say all of this as a gun owner. I say it as a conservative who was appointed to the federal bench by a Republican president. I say it as someone who prefers Fox News to MSNBC, and National Review Online to the Daily Kos. I say it as someone who thinks the Supreme Court got it right in District of Columbia vs. Heller, when it held that the 2nd Amendment gives us the right to possess guns for self-defense. (That's why I have mine.) I say it as someone who, generally speaking, is not a big fan of the regulatory state.

I even say it as someone whose feelings about the NRA mirror the left's feelings about Planned Parenthood: It has a useful advocacy function in our deliberative democracy, and much of what it does should not be controversial at all.

And I say it, finally, mindful of the arguments on the other side, at least as I understand them: that a high-capacity magazine is not that different from multiple smaller-capacity magazines; and that if we ban assault weapons and high-capacity magazines one day, there's a danger we would ban guns altogether the next, and your life might depend on you having one. [...]

Mourning is important, but so is decisive action.

The question is, will enough conservatives step up like this to make a difference? Will Congress members shake off their ideology long enough to make America safer? Will they show they care more about the lives of their fellow citizens than they do about donations from the NRA?

Please read the entire op-ed here.

FacebookTwitterRedditDiggStumbleUponTumblrLinkedInPinterestEmailShare
  • BeyondBeliefs

    Each Year, 4984 GOOD PEOPLE are murdered and 100's of thousands wounded by bullets. For each ONE BAD person killed by a bullet, 47 GOOD persons are killed by a bullet. Since the number of GOOD PEOPLE murdered by bullets is directly proportional to the number of bullets fired, therefore, any reduction in the number of bullets fired saves OUR family and OUR friends from being shot.
    Guns are designed to attack and murder a Living thing. Having a gun in our pocket makes no difference since we discover the BAD Person wants to rob us or shoot us when they point their gun at us. If the robber thinks we have a gun they will shoot first and then rob us. Attackers are not stupid. Republicans are.

  • Sally

    The danger in banning guns is that innocent people won't die daily..I find that a positive!