VIDEO-- Is Kerry's Senate seat real target of GOP Benghazi suicide squad? And GOP, about those embassy cuts...

FacebookTwitterRedditDiggStumbleUponTumblrLinkedInPinterestEmailShare

Visit NBCNews.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Your Daily Dose of BuzzFlash at Truthout, via my pal Mark Karlin:

To put it quite simply, if Obama backs down from appointing Rice due to the Republican Benghazi brigade, conventional wisdom has it that he is likely to appoint John Kerry to become Secretary of State.  If that were to be the case, Kerry's seat would become vacant.  [...]

Enter Republican Scott Brown [...]

As BuzzFlash at Truthout reader Emiliano de la Fuente e-mailed us today: "If the GOP is successful in squashing the idea of Susan Rice for Secretary of State and the President nominates John Kerry, it will immediately eliminate a Democratic senator and will give Scott Brown a chance to wiggle into position... Since he just ran in 2012, his name will be fresh in many voters’ minds."

In modern campaigns, political brand names are significant and Brown is one of those guys who even Democratic pundits and politicians in DC like to call in their village way "a very likeable person."   

It may be Massachusetts, and this theory may be a stretch, but remember that Brown was elected to the Senate once already – and remember that not too long ago Massachusetts elected Mitt Romney as governor.

And remember that the Republicans are indicating that they would be prone to give Kerry a relatively easy confirmation hearing in the Senate.  That's a scenario that will test Obama's mettle and how many chits he wants to call in for Rice at a time he is trying to proceed with budget negotiations.

Please read the whole post here.  And Mark has added this post: Colin Powell's Fabricated UN Iraq War Speech Was Fine With "Bomb, Bomb" McCain and Graham

And just for good measure, this L.A. Times letter from the editor, because our voices matter:

Re "Senators unswayed by talks with Rice," Nov. 28

Isn't there just one donkey willing to call out the elephant in the room when Republicans insist on ranting on and on about Benghazi? Simply put: Which party was responsible for the hundreds of millions of dollars withheld for embassy security improvements over the last few years, adversely affecting the work and safety of our diplomats abroad?

Perhaps the questions about U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Susan Rice's statements after the Benghazi attack should be aimed at Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) and his Republican colleagues in Congress who refused to properly fund embassy construction and security.

Dean James Loomos

Venice

FacebookTwitterRedditDiggStumbleUponTumblrLinkedInPinterestEmailShare
  • http://www.facebook.com/tim.weiss Tim Weiss

    I'd be happy if Obama could find and appoint a moderate Republican from the House or Senate (nobody is really coming to mind at the moment...). Would the Republicans vote against one of their own to get to John Kerry? Just a thought.

    Is Susan Rice even the best option out there? I know about her, but I really do need to inform myself a little more.

  • http://thepoliticalcarnival.net/ GottaLaff

    I agree re: Keystone!

  • Gindy51

    Obama should dump her, she has a severe conflict of interest in regards to the Keystone pipeline.
    Pick Al Gore instead and really watch those wingnuts go nuts.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_DW7LHDQQLRH5RQG2AGEXP35QGM Mr. B

    “Senators unswayed by talks with Rice”

    I've got two words for President Obama:

    1. RECESS
    2. APPOINTMENT

    And if anybody raises a stink about that, I've got two more words:

    1. JOHN
    2. BOLTON