VIDEO: The debate debate; let’s not forget what preceded it.

.

My friend, the wonderful author Jane Devin, wrote a post about this video here. I’d like to add my two cents.

All I’m seeing on the Tee Vee Machine lately are swats to the president for his debate performance. Never mind the months and months that preceded that night. Never mind Mitt Romney’s countless lies, Etch A Sketch moments, blatant hypocrisy, flip flops, sleazy out of context excerpts of President Obama’s words in his campaign ads, and his own constant evasions and terrible policy positions. He’s refused to give details of his tax plan, he’s refused to reveal his tax returns, he’s refused to let us know much about how he’d run this country at all, he’s shown his dangerous foreign policy ignorance repeatedly, he’s lied about his own bipartisanship, yet media commentators are frothing and hyperventilating over 90 minutes of television.

Yes, take the debate into account, but for goodness sake, look at the big picture. While the optics of that evening were disappointing for the president, he conveyed more than body language. He actually did rebut a few of Romney’s jaw-droppingly idiotic ideas (whatever they were), and even pre-emptively went after others.

But Romney and Obama both have long track records. If the election hinges on one debate, then why go through the motions and expense of campaigning? 

Share this video. Broaden the conversation, because guess what? TV is about ratings and profit, not necessarily about fairness or truth. It’s about entertainment (or in this case, infotainment). The media need a closer race, they must keep us hooked, because they thrive on our viewership.

It’s up to each of us to educate ourselves about who will be our next president, and laziness is not an option. Watch, read, research, listen. And learn.

Learn.

And then vote.

  • cognachas4paws

    I am in total agreement with you here.  The things I’m hearing about the debate are truly disheartening because no one seems to be mentioning the lies Romney told.  They’re commenting on style and style does not mean anything when it comes to governing.  Romney told one lie after another and I truly feel that leadership descends from character and given Romney’s constant lying, and the lying he did in the debate in particular, it is clear that he does not have the character to be an effective leader.  But you won’t hear that from the chattering heads on television or in countless internet posts by people who really ought to know better.  They act as if the debate were the actual election or the only thing that people would be basing their vote on.  It’s ridiculous.