VIDEO- Virgina Metro station anti-Obama ad, “Go to hell Barack,” won’t be pulled

There is an ad at a Virginia Metro station for a film called ”Sick & Sicker” that criticizes President Obama’s Affordable Care Act and displays the phrase “Go to hell, Barack.”

Disrespect is legal.

Apparently, disrespect is also acceptable as long as you publicly disrespect a black Democratic president.

Via 9News:

The ad is protected by the Constitution, Metro said in a statement Wednesday afternoon.

“WMATA advertising has been ruled by the courts as a public forum protected by the First Amendment of the Constitution, and we may not decline ads based on their political content. WMATA does not endorse the advertising on our system, and ads do not reflect the position of the Authority.”

Go to hell, “Sick & Sicker” publicity seekers.

  • Joeur98

    Jim Moran, a Democratic congressman from Virginia thinks the ad is disrespectful and should be removed. Obama has no respect for America or freedom or for that matter, anyone that voted for him. He is doing his best to create a Marxist society and Jim Moran obviously agrees with Obama. Remove the ad he says. Isn’t that saying remove freedom of speech?
    The sad thing is the fact that republicans aren’t any better. This country is in such a bad mess for 2 reasons: Democrats & Republicans. I am not a religious person but, MAY GOD HAVE MERCY ON US!

  • Clancy

    Depends on your definition of “respect,” I guess. In the late 1990s, there were ads in the Metro system that promoted various books and materials related to Scaife’s Arkansas Project that promoted the meme that President Clinton was to blame for the murder of his political opponents. To me, this seems worse than this one ad at the Clarendon stop. And, as I indicated above, disrespect is often subjective.

    I won’t argue that the tone (of political ads in the system) hasn’t become harsher since Obama took office. His opponents are better funded and seemingly less concerned about respecting the office of the presidency now than when a Republican holds it.

    And, clearly, this is political speech. I’m more than a little uncomfortable with the notion that it is somehow unacceptable to be disrespectful of the President of the United States through speech. This ad and movie are clearly aimed at a particular audience who find it acceptable to refer to the President of the United States in this manner. As I noted, I think their placement seems to be widely off mark and will likely turn more people off to their message than on to it, but it’s still their right to place the ad if they want to waste their money.

  • pinknlynn

    I’ve lived in DC for over 40 years and can’t recall any ads this disrespectful.  Can you name one?

  • pinknlynn

    Bull crap.  Can a billboard saying the same thing be put up about now deceased Briebert.  I think not.

  • Clancy

    The advertisements on WMATA’s buses, train stations, and bus stops have allowed political content for as long as I’ve been in the DC area (about 15 years). I’ve seen numerous ads that many would have considered disrespectful of Presidents Obama, Bush, and Clinton. Other political ads were simply distasteful or offensive (usually, these are placed by anti-gay or anti-choice groups). Given the political persuasion of most residents of the metropolitan area, if these fools want to throw their money away, I say let them.

  • HarborGuy

    IF that was up about BushCo….their butts would be rendered off to Gitmo.

    I say a bit of graffiti is in order.

  • http://twitter.com/tohu777 Greg L

    Very interesting. Something tells me that if the subject of the “Go to hell” ad had been e.g. Pope Ratzinger, or even a Governor of a state (albeit not applicable in D.C.), concerns about “decorum” and “respect for the office” and general offense taken by even a few riders would’ve gotten the ad pulled.

    And the objection stands: Right-wingers were fulminating about President Obama and the destruction of the U.S. etc. when he was FIRST inaugurated. None of these bilious, irrational, personally insulting ads/media diatribes/statements are really political statements directed specifically at a policy. They are ad hominem attacks of a sort the right-wing would never tolerate against their own.