New euphemism for torture: “The interview process”

It’s Saturday. You know what that means, right? Vent About TV “News” time.

Today’s episode is shorter than usual, because the jaw-dropping wording from MSNBC today was so egregious, it deserves to be singled out. CNN’s usual inanities will be set aside for the time being.

The anchor (Alex Witt, I believe) referred to torture as “enhanced interrogation” several times, which was annoying enough, and sadly, is nothing unusual. But when she called it “the interview process“– twice– while alluding to waterboarding and other abuse, I wanted to scream. In fact, I did.

No, MSNBC, “interviewing” and torture aren’t synonymous. Detainees who suffered physical and psychological damage didn’t get that way sitting across a desk from someone, having a conversation in an office setting.

What BushCo did to many of their prisoners was not an “interview process”. It was torture.

Torture.

Call it what it is, stop using euphemisms, and impart accurate information to viewers. This kind of reporting is ridiculous, and tacitly covering for perpetrators of war crimes is inexcusable.

  • http://twitter.com/joebodolai Joe Bodolai

    The safe distance these people have from the reality of real torture and their euphemisms are exactly the opposite of real “news”. It’s just official press release spoken out loud. I love how vigilant thorough you are posting on Twitter, especially your live tweeting and “short version” threads. Here’s something I wrote about torture, but it includes a graphic I made that sums up where torture stands today:

    Torture: Is This the America We Want in the World? http://wp.me/pKBYM-rc