Study: Gas from fracking worse than coal on climate

FacebookTwitterRedditDiggStumbleUponTumblrLinkedInPinterestEmailShare

First off, the HBO movie Gasland is a must-must-must see. It’s all about fracking, which is explained here. Fracking is destroying lives, destroying the environment, and needs to stop.

Need more proof? The Hill provides a sneak preview:

Cornell University professors will soon publish research that concludes natural gas produced with a drilling method called “hydraulic fracturing” contributes to global warming as much as coal, or even more.

The conclusion is explosive because natural gas enjoys broad political support – including White House backing – due to its domestic abundance and lower carbon dioxide emissions when burned than other fossil fuels.

Cornell Prof. Robert Howarth, however, argues that development of gas from shale rock formations produced through hydraulic fracturing – dubbed “fracking” – brings far more methane emissions than conventional gas production.

Professor Howarth:

“The [greenhouse gas] footprint for shale gas is greater than that for conventional gas or oil when viewed on any time horizon, but particularly so over 20 years. Compared to coal, the footprint of shale gas is at least 20% greater and perhaps more than twice as great on the 20-year horizon and is comparable when compared over 100 years,” states the upcoming study from Howarth, who is a professor of ecology and environmental biology, and other Cornell researchers.

Here is a sneak peek at the study, which, by the way, is not definitive. Please read the entire Hill piece for more details.

This is one of those times when "looking forward as opposed to looking backwards” is a very wise idea.

And the corporate bludgeoning will start in 5... 4... 3... 2...

FacebookTwitterRedditDiggStumbleUponTumblrLinkedInPinterestEmailShare