Commenter: “Tim Profitt is the ‘victim’ here”

I’d like to show you a comment that’s under the post, PhotOh! Rand Pauler who stomped on the woman’s head served with summons.

At first, I thought it was one of our regulars kidding around.  Who are these people?

holyreality wrote:

Tim Profitt is the “victim” here, it’s his constitutional right to pursue happiness being violated.
__
The angry white men have had it up to here^, and now it is time to take OUR (AWM)country back.

With any luck, he will become a martyr for Sarah, getting more AWM vote out across the nation.

What exactly does “it’s his constitutional right to pursue happiness being violated” mean?

And pray tell, back from what do these “angry white men” want to take the country?  And why does the commenter refer only to white men?

I love how the people who carry around signs that read “Don’t tread on me” don’t mind treading– stomping– all over a woman who did nothing that warranted violence. Nothing.

Maybe the author of that comment needs to review this post. He might learn something about the consequences of his little uprising… if that’s even possible.

UPDATE: If, indeed, the comment was done as a joke, it might have been better to make it more obvious.  If not, I stand by the post.  My remarks still apply to those who have said similar things under a YouTube post of mine. I had to disallow comments, it was that bad.