The NRA Protects a Potential Serial Killer

FacebookTwitterRedditDiggStumbleUponTumblrLinkedInPinterestEmailShare

Guest blog by Cliff Schecter:

What does the leadership of the National Rifle Association have to do to finally convince anyone paying attention that they are extremist, self-interested, and devoid of all principle? Here's an idea: They could blatantly lie about the law in an attempt to block authorities in Daytona Beach, Florida, from accessing information that would help law enforcement catch a potential serial killer.

Oh wait, they've already done that.

You see, Daytona Beach police have determined through forensic evidence that the same kind of weapon was used to kill three women (and maybe a fourth) over the past few years, so they have taken what could be considered a logical next step. They didn't go on a fishing expedition (in fact this is exactly the way a gun dealer who cooperated put it), but asked gun dealers located in the specific counties where the homicides took place if they could see their records during a specific period of time (2004 and 2005), to determine who might have bought this weapon and used it to kill people.

Crazy, right?

And the key elements here are that the police have only "asked" for, not demanded the records, and they are only seeking to look at them, not copy them. But for those who run the NRA, who would consider a law disarming Ayman al-Zawahiri a ride along the slippery slope to a general handgun ban, this is just beyond the pale. So they trotted out one of their lobbyist friends in Tallahassee to lie about the law, to say what the police were doing was illegal -- and of course launched the requisite faux-populist appeals to the same conspiratorial, anti-government, pearl-clutchers who Sarah Palin makes millions scaring the bejesus out of via rationality-challenged Facebook missives.

Good if you're a gun manufacturer or wealthy NRA lobbyist, not so much if one of these four women murdered was your daughter, sister or mother.

What's truly amazing, though, is how the Washington NRA leadership is always there for the worst among us. Do you want to continue to sell guns to criminals, terrorists, and those not of sound mind through the gun show loophole -- unlike 69% of NRA members and 85% of non-NRA gun owners who support a simple background check at gun shows to prevent this insanity? No worries, NRA Executive VP Wayne LaPierre has got your back! Do you think it's a swell idea to sell guns & explosives to those being actively investigated by the FBI, TSA or DHS? Excellent! Top NRA lobbyist Chris Cox is there to ensure you can continue to hawk your wares to those who can't even get on airplanes because they are being investigated for being members of violent, terrorist organizations -- something 82% of the NRA's own membership and 86% of non-NRA gun owners agree is just plain nuts.

Honestly, do you know of much else in the world that 86% of any group agree on, much less those you'd think would be most supportive of the National Rifle Association's leadership?

There may have been a time in the past when the NRA represented their members. When they might have cared about protecting the actual rights of honest American citizens to bear arms, as opposed to any thug with a checkbook. Not anymore. The NRA have become the elite, Washington insiders they always rant on and on about -- political mercenaries who care only about how much money they can raise doing the dirty work for wealthy gun manufacturers and how much power they can represent at Beltway cocktail parties. What their actual members think, or what the citizens of this country want, doesn't really matter. Instead, they've bought off virtually the entire Washington Republican Party (with some notable exceptions, like Mike Castle of Delaware, George Voinovich of Ohio and Dick Lugar of Indiana), not to mention a good chunk of the easily-purchased Blue-Dog Democrats who have decided that, in the interest of keeping the campaign cash flowing, "well-regulated militia" really means Eric Rudolph and the Son of Sam have gun rights too. So what politicians actually think also matters little to them. Or perhaps as one Washington Post reporter put it, "Terrorists who want to buy guns have friends on Capitol Hill."

Conservatives got a front row seat for the NRA's elitism and treachery during the recent congressional negotiations over the Disclose Act. The NRA made sure that they -- and only they -- would be exempt from requirements that interest groups disclose where their almost unlimited campaign funds will come from in light of the Supreme Court's Citizens United decision. Sure, they talked a good game about "free speech," but when it came time to stand up for their supposed principles, the Washington NRA leadership was all too happy to leave their comrades, such as the Gun Owners of America, out in the cold. Perhaps that's why the rabidly pro-gun Virginia Citizens Defense League called the NRA's leadership "bought off." Hmm, are you sensing a pattern here?

And now this compassion-cloistered organization is expanding the number of issues on which they distort policy, because, really, how can anyone vote on health care or the environment before knowing how a bunch of Washington elites owned by Big Guns think about these matters? Especially those who are trying to protect a potential serial killer or fight for the rights of the Nidal Hassans and John Patrick Bedells of this world to continue buying guns without limit or a background check. Or push guns into a bar near you, something opposed by every single police organization, as well as anyone with an ounce of common sense. Once again, it's the National Rifle Association's leadership against anyone who gets in their way, as was recently made clear by Tennessee Republican State Legislator Joe McCord, who summed up this particular madness as well as the general way in which the NRA serves the interests of its elites while making this country more crime-ridden and more susceptible to terrorism every single day:

"Essentially, NRA is saying to us, if you don't support and vote for carrying guns in bars, we will not endorse you," McCord said. "This line of reasoning borders on lunacy.""What line will we not cross for the NRA? At what point do we say that's too much?" asked McCord, who is not seeking re-election. "I'm sorry for those of you who feel you have to hold your nose and vote for it... because of the NRA."

Law enforcement officials in Florida are just the latest in a long line of groups forced to hold their nose while the NRA crosses yet another line that makes Americans less safe and dishonors the will of their own membership.

Would that it weren't so, Mr. McCord.

Cross-posted at HuffPo.

FacebookTwitterRedditDiggStumbleUponTumblrLinkedInPinterestEmailShare
  • http://twitter.com/me1an1e Melanie

    Look, I hate guns and our nations love of them, but, I read this and can't help wondering what the thought is where NC is trying to get copies of book orders from amazon in order to assess tax penalties against residents who didn't declare online purchases on their state tax form and pay state taxes - the ACLU is rightfully saying that the state asking to see what books we are buying is an infringement on our rights. Like it or not, guns are repeatedly upheld as part of our rights as well, the state wanting to see them, no matter how right the reason this time, is an infringement on our rights. Civil Liberties are not just 2 b protected when you agree, but, always, because you may not agree next time.

  • Cliff Schecter

    It's called clicking on a link. You should try it sometime. I summarized specifics are at the link. You understand how this Internet thing works, right?

    If you're going to comment, try using a mouse first and reading where the article leads you. I suspect your mind is already made up, though, so I don't much care in your case...

    Btw this is Cliff, the factless author...:)

  • Guest

    Okay, you still didn't mention what the NRA said the law was and what the law actually states. It just seems like an article bashing the NRA with little real facts. If your going to write a news article please stick to the facts so we can make up our own mind.

  • http://twitter.com/BoomerJack Jack M. Boardman

    I'm a gun-owner. I'm NOT a member of the NRA. Most gun-owners are not. This is why!