Al Franken anti-rape amendment fallout has GOP fuming

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
Pinterest

I love the way they act like all this is so “unprecedented”. You freaks voted to deny a woman a right to redress and it’s Franken that’s being mean? I’m only excerpting part, go read the whole thing for their foot stomping hissy fits. Oh, and Senator Franken got “heated” in a discussion? What a bunch of weepy hothouse flowers, clutching pearls and all.

Republican senators feel burned by Al Franken — and not by his old jokes.

The Republicans are steamed at Franken because partisans on the left are using a measure he sponsored to paint them as rapist sympathizers — and because Franken isn’t doing much to stop them.

“Trying to tap into the natural sympathy that we have for this victim of this rape —and use that as a justification to frankly misrepresent and embarrass his colleagues, I don’t think it’s a very constructive thing,” Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas) said in an interview.

(snip)

In a chamber where relationship-building is seen as critical, some GOP senators question whether Franken’s handling of the amendment could damage his ability to work across the aisle. Soon after Tennessee GOP Sens. Bob Corker and Lamar Alexander co-wrote an op-ed in a local newspaper defending their votes against the Franken measure, the Minnesota Democrat confronted each senator separately to dispute their column — and grew particularly angry in a tense exchange with Corker.

People familiar with the Corker exchange say it was heated and ended abruptly — a sharp departure from the norm on the usually clubby Senate floor.

At issue is an amendment to the Pentagon spending bill that would bar “future and existing” federal contracts to defense contractors and subcontractors “at any tier” who mandate employees go through a company’s arbitration process for workplace discrimination claims — including claims of sexual assault. The measure passed 68-30, with 10 Republicans voting yes and 30 voting no.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • Tim Wood

    Do remember the GOP vote has little to do with rape directly. It has everything to do with their jihad (specifically) against plaintiffs' lawyers.

    The GOP want civil disputes to be decided in private arbitration, where attorneys are often not permitted to appear, instead of in public courts, whenever possible. That they ignored the problems with trying sexual assault in arbitration instead of proposing arbitration with several exceptions shows GOP myopia and utter beholdenness to big business.

  • Ray

    Ah poor Republicans all they did was vote via how they feel about the bill. What a shame that it showed to the whole world what their inner feelings are about women, rape and just a small glimpse of what kind of policies this country would have if they were in power. The Republican party wow how low they have sunk!